<u>Evolution is sometimes a controversial:</u>
Evolution is the most scientific explanation about how the life forms of earth originated and turned into the form that we see today.
I don’t think there should be a controversy because there is no other explanation that proves to be more logical than the theory of evolution. Evolution is a theory that has several supporting proofs and the theory itself was formed after several years of detailed study and observation.
I don’t think alternatives to evolution should be taught at schools. Alternative theories to evolution are based on various religious beliefs which lack a scientific basis.
Schools should be a place that enables students to do productive scientific thinking and teaching alternatives to evolution wouldn’t be a good idea.
The answer would be option B "Chemical energy." Photosynthesis is the process plants use to make their food so in this case they will convert solar energy into chemical energy which is food. Chemical energy are basically old elements being made into new elements for example burning paper, it will change into as which is a chemical change. But converting solar energy into chemical energy is a plant making produce. Like, a apple tree growing apples.
Hope this helps!
Because Zika gives viruses and things like that to children but when you are a woman and you could get pregnant or you are pregnant it could cuz birth defects and other things to your baby
They will have to change their hypothesis and try the experiment all over again or you also need to state in your conclusion that your hypothesis was wrong
