Essay:
I'd give the money to an organisation working on recovering the damage we did to Earth. That would have to be an organisation cleaning oceans, planting trees and teaching people about the importance of a sustainable and healthy environment.
I'd donate it to a small organisation, nothing too famous. A small group of people doing what they believe is right, working hard, to clear what other, brainless people, have done.
I'd hope that the money could be an incentive for them to continue doing what they do, and to continue gathering people into a movement our faith and the one of our planet depends on.
Notes:
- That is MY way of using easy-gained, extra 20k dollars. If you do not agree, please give me an idea of what you'd do and I'll hand in a better adapted essay.
- Since we're asked to write a descriptive essay, I tried to describe the organisation as much as I could. If you think you could add anything using the same thinking-line, please do.
Hope it helped,
BiologiaMagister
I would need the passage to help
The correct answer is B. I called for Sadie. Sadie didn't answer. I waited up for Sadie didn't come home.
Explanation:
Parallel constructions involve the repetition of a grammatical pattern including the use of the same tense or grammatical form to express elements of the same importance. This structure is used in the sentence "I called for Sadie. Sadie didn't answer. I waited up for Sadie didn't come home" because in this sentence all the actions are expressed using the simple past tense through verbs such as called, waited, or didn't answer. Moreover, this structure helps the author create a sad tone because all the actions expressed the idea Sadie cannot be found.
<span>The subject tells what the sentence is about; it contains the main noun or noun phrase. </span>
