1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
liubo4ka [24]
3 years ago
9

Americans spend about 16 percent of their income on food. Families in less developed countries typically spend _____ of their to

tal income on food.
History
2 answers:
azamat3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer is - approximately 50%.

Even though we can roughly put lot of countries in the least developed countries list, still there are differences from country to country. The expenditure on food, from the total available income, in the least developed countries accounts for roughly 50% on average. Now the average can be misleading, as most of the people in the least developed countries spend in the range of the 40% to 46% percents, but there are some where over 80% is spent on food, like Zimbabwe for example, which increases the total average.

vovangra [49]3 years ago
3 0

Statistically, Less developed countries typically spend over half of their household income on food. In 2016 a survey showed that out of nine less developed countries observed, four were in Africa, four in Asia, and one in South America, below is the outcome of the survey.

<u>AFRICA</u>

Nigeria 56.4%.

Kenya 46.7%.

Cameroon 45.6%.

Algeria 42.5%.

<u>ASIA</u>

Kazakhstan 43.0%.

the Philippines 41.9%.

Pakistan 40.9%.

Azerbaijan 40.1%.

Guatemala is the only country from South American to appear on the list and families here spend about 40.6% of its income on food.

However, with the crisis in Zimbabwe, Somalia, Sudan, and other less developed countries facing Economic, financial and food crisis, it is estimated that as at January 2019, they spend almost 87% of their household income on food.

You might be interested in
How did the abolitionist movement and the underground railroad help increase differences between the north and south
Lunna [17]

Answer:

The abolitionist movement and the underground railroad increased tensions between the North and South because they highlighted the problem of slavery while fighting against it directly. Southern states felt attacked by these movements.

Explanation:

Slavery was an important feature of Souther identity. Because of their strong defense of slavery they felt personally attacked by any critics of the slavery system.

Thus as the abolitionist movement and the underground railroad gained momentum these questions got more intense. In the South the hate for abolitionism got to the point where censorship was overt: abolitionism was illegal and president Andrew Jackson prohibited the postal service from delivering abolitionist publications to the South.

These tensions were not resolved and would lead to the Civil War.

8 0
3 years ago
The main reason the US Senate rejected the treaty of Versallies was because
sineoko [7]
The main reason the US Senate rejected the treaty of Versailles was because they feared that US involvement in the League of Nations would mean that American troops would be sent into Europe and settle European disputes.
4 0
3 years ago
After the 28-American War the U.S. annexed the Philippines and they were happy to have America to replace Spain as a colonial pa
Kitty [74]
No, it is false that after the Spanish-American War the people of the Philippines were happy to have America replace Spain as a colonial partner, since many in the Philippines wanted full independence. 
5 0
3 years ago
Which sentence in this excerpt from Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address shows that he believed the Union was forced into
Ivahew [28]
The second last sentence of the first paragraph is the key message conveying Lincoln's view that war was forced for the protection of the nation.

"<span>Both parties deprecated war; but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive; and the other would accept war rather than let it perish."</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
¿Por qué fueron las colonias importantes para Inglaterra?
blsea [12.9K]

ENGLISH:As a result, for the most part, the English colonies in North America were business ventures. They provided an outlet for England's surplus population and (in some cases) more religious freedom than England did, but their primary purpose was to make money for their sponsors.

SPANISH:

Como resultado, en su mayor parte, las colonias inglesas en América del Norte eran empresas comerciales. Proporcionaron una salida para el excedente de población de Inglaterra y (en algunos casos) más libertad religiosa que Inglaterra, pero su propósito principal era hacer dinero para sus patrocinadores.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What caused King Philip’s War?
    9·1 answer
  • : A 10 pound block of cheese in the refrigerator is growing green, fuzzy spots
    9·1 answer
  • In the constitution of every state, final authority rests with ________.
    12·1 answer
  • How was the rise of the civil service related to President Garfield’s assassination?
    12·2 answers
  • Which best describes a significant difference between north and south in years leading up to the civil war
    14·1 answer
  • What are two major reasons for the eventual failure of Prohibition?
    6·1 answer
  • The main focus of the temperance movement was to
    8·1 answer
  • 9)
    14·1 answer
  • During the 1902 coal strike, how did Roosevelt end the dispute between the union and coal mine owners? Question 14 options: He f
    12·2 answers
  • India, Vietnam, and Kenya all gained independence from France and Britain.
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!