These are the answers:
1. Question 1:
What statement best describes King’s purpose in writing the letter?
The statement that best describes King’s purpose in writing the letter is:
King sought to respond to the criticism he received from people that he considered to be colleagues by methodically addressing each of their claims.
This statement is supported by King in the first paragrph of the letter when He states “since I feel that you are men of genuine good will and that your criticisms are sincerely set forth, I want to try to answer your statement in what I hope will be patient and reasonable terms”.
2. Question 2 :
Which statement best expresses King’s central argument in the text?
The presence of injustice necessitates a nonviolent response in order to repair the harms of prejudice and discrimination.
With this statement King tries to let readers know that injustice He and his followers sought could not be geographically isolated.
3. Question 3.
Which statement best supports the answer to Question 2?
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”
4. Question 4 (1 point) Re-read paragraphs 8-13. How did direct action in Birmingham, according to King, develop over time?
Question 4 options:
After undergoing mental preparation and training, activists made considerations about the timing of holiday shopping seasons as well as the mayoral election.
After these considerations Kings states: Having aided in this community need, we felt that our direct action program could be delayed no longer.
5. Question 5
How does the section in which King describes his feelings about the church, paragraphs 32-44, contribute to the development of ideas in the text?
Question 5 options:
King examines the church’s response and decides that more work must be done to engage the church in the civil rights movement, which conveys the sense that the movement is not yet over.
One of the argument that support this selection is mentioned by King when He says: If today's church does not recapture the sacrificial spirit of the early church, it will lose its authenticity, forfeit the loyalty of millions, and be dismissed as an irrelevant social club with no meaning for the twentieth century.