1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Romashka [77]
3 years ago
13

The Constitutional Convention’s dispute over state representation was settled by the a)Great Compromise. b)Missouri Compromise.

c)Virginia Compromise. d)Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise.
History
2 answers:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
6 0
A) Great Compromise

Larger States liked the Virginia Plan, Smaller States liked the NJ Plan. The convention compromised by making a House and Senate and would use both plans 
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
6 0

The correct option is A

The Connecticut Commitment of 1787 in the United States, also known as the Great Compromise, originated in the creation of legislative bodies. He joined the Virginia Plan that favored population-based representation, and the New Jersey Plan, which listed each state as an equal. Roger Sherman of Connecticut played an important role in building this commitment.

It established a bicameral system: one chamber in favor of the Virginia Plan, based on the population of the States, and the other in accordance with the New Jersey Plan, by which all States voted in equality.

You might be interested in
Which of the following powers is a concurrent power shared by both the Federal Government and the State governments?
Alina [70]

Concurrent powers are powers that are shared by both the State and the federal government. These powers may be exercised simultaneously within the same territory and in relation to the same body of citizens.

Regulating elections, taxing, borrowing money and establishing courts.

Hope this helps qwq

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Instructions: Select all the correct answers.
Sidana [21]
Moses king and saul samuel

7 0
3 years ago
Is the group of citizens usually 23 that determine if there is sufficient evidence to proceed to
lana66690 [7]
The group that decides whether there is sufficient evidence to bring the person to trial consists anywhere between 16-23 people.
8 0
3 years ago
Why did James l quarrel with parliament
MakcuM [25]

He believed in the devine right of kings

3 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP ASAP
ch4aika [34]

Answer:

B is Ans

Explanation:

I had read this make me brillent

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Please do 1-3 I need help
    14·1 answer
  • As world war I was about to unfold, what common enemy did Austria-Hungary and Germany share
    6·1 answer
  • How did the political parties affect voter turnout when they were stronger
    8·2 answers
  • What was Magellan's goal for his voyage in 1519?
    8·2 answers
  • The stradivari family is famous for crafting
    5·1 answer
  • Please! need help
    7·1 answer
  • PLS HELP
    9·2 answers
  • How do extreme groups affect our country?
    6·2 answers
  • What was declared a vegetable by the supreme court in 1893?
    15·1 answer
  • How have Supreme Court cases had the power of law in settling some civil rights issues? Cite a few specific examples of how indi
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!