Answer: strengthens the HONOR system.
Explanation: When ethical psychologists share the results of their research data with other professionals, it allows verification of results and therefore strengthens the honor system.
The honor system is a system of conduct in which participants are trusted not to take unfair advantage of others.
Answer:
Conventional
Explanation:
During the conventional level of moral development, most people still haven't gained enough personal knowledge and experience to develop their sense of moral standard. Typically, this level occurred when we're entering our adolescent years.
In this stage, most people will try to thrive to be "Good girls" or "good boys" in the social group, which is why they tend to tried their best in complying to the rules and values imposed by the society.
The law of moral cause-and-effect is called the law of Karma.
Depending on whoever you ask, there are several opinions on what karma really is. While some adhere to the traditional interpretation rooted in Eastern religions, others interpret it more in line with a Western conception of good and evil. This can consequently result in various interpretations of how karma functions in life. This law states that whatever ideas or energy one put out, one receives back, whether it's positive or negative. One must embody and merit the things they want in order to obtain them. It's the idea that you harvest what one sows. Memories and wants are shaped by karma, which then dictates how one lives. The karmic software that controls one's existence is comprised of actions, memories, and desires.
To learn more about the Law of Karma refer to:
brainly.com/question/18175497
#SPJ1
Answer:
smarter?
Explanation:
You will have more knowledge with more education
Answer:
D. Judicial Activism
Explanation:
Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.
It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.
