Answer:
Businessmen during the Gilded Age, in the late 19th century, supported relaxed immigration laws because they bring unskilled workers in the country. Industries in the late 19th century, employed immigrants as labors because they reduced the costs of production by paying them less money, which profited the industrialists. The supply of cheap labor was one of the reasons for the growth of industrialization in America.
Answer:
Child of Israel
Explanation:
I woke up this morning and there is excitement in the air for I could overhear the man speaking that today the walls would come down.26
I’m standing near Joshua and I hear him say take up the ark and have the priest carry seven trumpets before it. Joshua is now telling the people go! March around the enclosure. 59
We all begin marching. We marched around the city once and then twice and then three times,four, five and six more times but on the seventh something exciting was supposed to happen! On that seventh time around Joshua said to the people shout and we shouted !106
The noise was deafening from the people and the trumpets but when we shouted and the trumpets made their noise the walls of Jericho started to shake and then they fell. 138
The ruling determined that the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional.
In doing so, the Supreme Court asserted that it has the right to declare laws of Congress unconstitutional.
It was sort of a roundabout way in which the principle of judicial review was asserted by the Supreme Court in the case of Marbury v. Madison. William Marbury had been appointed Justice of the Peace for the District of Columbia by outgoing president John Adams -- one of a number of such last-minute appointments made by Adams. When Thomas Jefferson came into office as president, he directed his Secretary of State, James Madison, not to deliver many of the commission papers for appointees such as Marbury. Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court directly to hear his case, as a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789 had made possible. The Court said that particular provision of the Judiciary Act was in conflict with Article III of the Constitution, and so they could not issue a specific ruling in Marbury's case (which they believe he should have won). But the bottom line was, the Court had taken up the right of judicial review by calling out a portion of the Judiciary Act of 1789 as unconstitutional.
