Explanation:
<h3>Napoleon Bonaparte, (1769 - 1821) also known as Napolen I, was a French military leader and emperor who conquered much of Europe in the early 19th century. Born on the island of Corsica, Napoleon rapidly rose through the ranks of the military during the French revolution (1789-1799).</h3>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.
There is no question here. We just have a statement.
What is your question? What do you want to know?
If this is a true or false question, then the correct answer is "true."
We can say that the different conceptions of federalism, as the system of federalism, have changed throughout U.S. History. Basically, what had happened is that the United States has moved from a system of dual federalism to one of cooperative federalism.
Particularly, after the Great Depression that started on October 29, 1929, there has been a more cooperative form of federalism as the powers of the federal government expanded. Indeed, President Ronald Reagan expressed in the 1980s that there was going to be new federalism in the US.
For the main reason that it was not furthermore stated in the constitution, <span>the u.s. supreme court that held that the city's anti-gang was considered to be unconstitutional. In addition, a policy or act could be considered as a "constitutional" one if it is not in accordance to the United States book of laws.</span>
Assuming this takes place before the USSR joined the war in June 1941, the war would have been won. Up until that point pretty much all of Europe had been taken over, and so if Britsinbhad not held out until 1941 Nazi Germany would have won the war.
However, to answer your question they would have had an easier time against the USSR and the USA, presuming that Operation Barbarossa still takes place and so does Pearl Harbour.
<span>This is because although Britain was bankrupt(and obviously the land less would have ended) and so had no monetary funds, but its Empire meant that assuming the entire Empire swore aliiegance to Nazi Germany rather than continuing to fight despite Great Britainbitself being conquered, they would have lots of land and some extra troops from around the enpire to that would have benefited all fronts of the war. Also the Germans would have the Supermaribe Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Hawker Hurricanes (this is assuming that all British planes are not destroyed during the Blitzkrieg plan) with which to fill the gaps in their Luftwaffe, which was heavily depleted in the Battle of Britain. They would also have the schematics for the Spitfire, allowing them to build more, the Spirfire was a very useful plane.</span>
