Answer:
Please check the info below
Explanation:
1. For Osaka
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 792000 / $9900000 *100
= 8.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 9900000 / $ 2475000 * 100
= 4.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 8% *4 %
= 32.00%
Hence the correct answer is 32.00%
For Yokohama :
Margin = Net Operating Income / Sales *100
= $ 2900000 / $ 29000000*100
= 10.00%
Turnover = Sales / Average Operating Assets * 100
= $ 29000000 / $ 14500000* 100
= 2.00%
ROI = Margin * Turnover
= 10% *2 %
= 20.00%
Hence the correct answer is 20.00%
2. The correct answer is
Osaka = $ 371,250
Yokohama = $ 435,000
3. The correct answer is No
This is because since Osaka has a higher ROI, Yokohama’s greater amount of residual income is not an indication that it is better managed
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
An oligopoly can cause market failure because companies that form the oligopoly do not allow other companies to enter and compete in the market. This action limits consumers to choose from a variety of options, including quality, the best price, and service.
Often, oligopoly associates the strongest or more powerful companies in order to wipe out other minor competitors. They want to establish a dominant presence that affects prices and consumers participation.
Oligopoly practices result in inefficiency and instability in the market. That is why oligopolies are not good for the economy.
The automobile industry is mostly associated with an oligopoly.
When a market is controlled by just a few numbers of companies, but none of them is above the others, we are talking about an oligopoly. They can collude intentionally or not, to establish prizes and to not let other companies compete with them.
Answer:
hiring higher-quality workers at a higher wage
Explanation:
Possible causes of unfavorable labor rate variances include:
An increase in pay for employees.
Working overtime hours paid at a premium above the basic rate.
Using direct labor employees who were more skilled and experienced than the ‘normal’ and who are paid more than the standard rate per hour (adverse rate variance).
Based on the above discussion, the answer is hiring higher-quality workers at a higher wage
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
Common resource is the resources like pasture or water which provides the users with the benefits or advantage of tangible. The major and vital concern with the common resources is being overused, especially when there is a system which is poor social management in place for protecting the core resources.
There is tendency of being overused of the resources as the individuals or the person ignore the cost and its use of the resource has on others.
