Answer: a) $8,250 b) $4,125 c) No sales tax or use tax liability d) $560 e) No sales tax or use tax liability would be accrued.
Explanation:
a) $100,000 x 8.25% = $ 8,250 (California had $100,000 sales and 8.25 % sales tax)
b) $50,000 x 8.25% = $4,125
c)As TV lacks physical presence in New York and Wyoming, therefore, it would have no sales tax or use tax liability.
d)$10,000 x 5.6% sales = $560. TV would have tax liability in Arizona but not in Oregon.
e) If TV shipped through common carrier to its clients in Arizona other than from having Reggie deliver them, then no sales tax would occur. However, customer's would still be subjected to the Arizona state use tax liability.
5.7619441163552
But you should round it to the nearest hundredth which would be 5.76
Answer:
c. achieve greater market power.
Explanation:
Acquisitions to meet a market power objective generally involve buying a supplier, a competitor, a distributor, or a business in a highly related industry. Though a number of firms may feel that they have an internal core competence, they may be unable to exploit their resources and capabilities because of a lack of size.
Answer:
A governmental audit may extend beyond an examination leading to the expression of an opinion on the fairness of financial statement presentation to include
investigation of the economy, efficiency and effectiveness of operations.
Explanation:
This is known as a value for money audit. It is an independent evidence-based investigation which examines and reports on whether economy, effectiveness, and efficiency have been achieved in the use of governmental funds, which are public funds. This is how many audits for governmental funds are conducted, by expanding the scope to include these three important operational elements.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "D": Interest in solving a problem.
Explanation:
Situational leadership is exercised by managers when they need to adapt their method of working to the current situation their companies are facing. The key point is to get to the solution of the problem. Thus, the leader does not wait for the subordinates to adapt to his or her leadership style but is the leader who proactively takes a step towards a change.