Answer:
The picture on the screen.
Explanation:
André Bazin was a well-known, celebrated and influential French film critic and film philosopher. His writing journey started about film in 1943 and he was the co-founder of the popular film magazine Cahiers du cinéma in the year 1951, alongside Joseph-Marie Lo Duca and Jacques Doniol-Valcroze.
He used his term presence to describe the moviegoer's sense that he is within the same spatial/temporal continuum as the picture on the screen.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
I think after doing some quick googling I feel like D is the correct choice.
The Dred Scott case was a major event on the road to the Civil War. The Supreme Court's ruling was a provocative opinion. It stated flatly that Blacks had "no rights which the white man was bound to respect" and rejected the right of any territory to ban slavery within its own borders.
The answer is D b/c they basically denied him his rights and told him that someone's property cannot sue and said that just because he lived in a free state doesnt make him free.
Answer:
The best answer to the question: If they did not care about any future relationship they might have, had lots of money, and just wanted to prove they were right, they should:___, would be: Litigate.
Explanation:
Litigation is defined precisely as a legal contest, an argmentation that is taken usually before the courts, in order to settle a matter that is being argued upon, by two or more sides. However, the process of litigation requires more than just two people arguing; it requires lawyers, and judicial processes, which are pretty expensive. Aria and Rick wish to establish if either of them breached a contract and since neither is going to give in and accept that the other might be right, if they had the necessary money, and did not fear that a future relationship between them might be damaged due to such proceedings, then they would choose litigation as their means of solving the issue and proving they were right.
Tha awncer is b yw for that
Answer:
Explanation:
Imagine that instead of sky scrapers we had all the offices in them occupying lots. It would be somewhat like a mid west city like Great Falls Montana. I'm asking you to see New York as you would see Great Falls.
Great falls has some buildings that are 2 stories -- none that are much more that I know of. Great Falls has a population of 40000 roughly. New York has a population of about 8000000. So to construct New York on a Great Falls model, you would need 200 communities the size of Great Falls. Consider what that would do the environment.
The connection to each place of business and residential area would be many many times larger. Waste would create an immense almost unimaginable problem. The environment wouldn't know how to handle the spread created by small residential homes and no more than 1 or 2 story buildings.
The spread would create many times the problems that skyscrapers create and that's only 1 problem.
Question 2
This is a hard question. It depends on the slave owners. Some would think of their slaves as human beings same as them. Some were taught to read and write along with the owner's children. Most were not. Some were taught some sort of religious principles. Many were not. Some wanted freedom, others did not.
There's no simple answer to this. The economy of the south depended on slaves. No matter how humane the owners, there was still work to be done.
