If the US had been poor in natural resources than it likely would not have been a major leader in the Industrial Revolution, and would have had to import many resources from South America and elsewhere.
If the US had been poor in natural resources than it likely would not have been a major leader in the Industrial Revolution, and would have had to import many resources from South America and elsewhere.
Explanation:
Yes if the US was poor in common resources industrialization would be considerably altered. There would signify stagnant extension and smaller wealth. There further would not be as various industries. less industry, and deliberate growth.
I mean... Eventually some kings left the Papal authority. However, remember the crusades? It united nearly everyone in Europe. Some to the point of making new states.
