Answer:
The correct answer choice to the question: What is a difference between a PAC and a super PAC, would be: PACs can contribute directly to candidates, but super PACs cannot.
Explanation:
PACs are generally known as political action committees and their direct purpose is to become an organization that receives donations and funds from members and supporters and directly play a role in a candidate´s campaign, a ballot, or a lawmaking process. However, PACs were placed under limitations as to how much money they could receive, and the sources of it, specifically corporations and labor unions, because they have direct impact on campaigns. In order to resolve that issue, super PACs, better known as independent-expenditure only committees, can receive unlimited funds from corporations and labor unions, as well as members, but these cannot go to impact a campaign. They can work with those funds in other ways, but not to impact a campaign, a ballot, or a lawmaking process.
<span>the American Revolution was a war in which the 13 American colonies won their independence from Great Britain. ... Colonists were angry at the British rulers, not only because they wanted more money from them, ... They got ready to fight.</span><span>
</span>
The men had more power and women just had to cook and clean
Because the U.S. didn't want war with Mexico and Mexico claimed that Texas was their land even though Mexico lost the war.
Answer:
Correct answer here is: Support those borrowing credit.
Explanation:
The attempt by governments all over the world, and especially in the United States, to regulate credit and the lending of money by financial institutions to individuals began in earnest during the 1960´s, and in the U.S, this became real with the passing of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, of 1968. However, never before was credit lending more controlled and protected than after the crisis of 2008, when the world almost faced a recession so severe, that it made experts believe the world was headed for a new Great Depression. The reason for this crisis was the immense mortgage bubble that was created, especially in the U.S, and the imminent scenario of financial institutions lending credit to people at really high risks, without employment, and without any backups. There was no control over these credits and both individuals and financial institutions embarked on a circle of lending and debt that led several of these institutions to bankruptcy. Because of this, in 2010, a new consumer protection act was passed to seek financial stability. With it, and for the first time, the U.S government took severe regulatory measures and put financial institutions under control, in order to protect consumers and prevent institutions from lending without certain limitations.
