By the late 1700s, Europeans had explored a great deal of the world. In fact, it is probably more beneficial to mention the places they had <em>not </em>explored.
Antarctica/the Arctic
Jungles/Rainforests in Oceania, Africa, SE Asia, and South America
The highest peaks of large mountain ranges (Himalayas, Andes, etc.).
Cans,bottles,plastic, and paper
Answer:
C. It committed human rights violation.
Explanation:
C is the correct answer as the totalitarian regime in that country is not allowing civil liberties.
A is not correct because there are practically no minorities there.
B is not correct because since the Korean War there were no larger wars here.
D is not correct, as the country is the part of UN since 1991.
Answer:
Arabia in the last decade, Bretzke’s “lithic assemblage” poses a challenge to the standard ‘out of Africa’ model of early human dispersal that has dominated the scientific consensus since the late 1990s.
“The model usually says that modern humans came out of Africa between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago, but it is important to realise that we now have archaeological evidence to support the theory that there was an earlier expansion of modern humans,” the archaeologist explains.
“And now there is more and more evidence from both genetic studies and from other finds in Arabia and Asia that there might have been multiple expansions earlier than that.”
If Bretzke’s analysis is correct, then the tools not only testify to the human occupation of Arabia at least 75,000 years earlier than was previously accepted, but Suhailah is also one of the most important prehistoric archaeological sites, not just in the UAE but across the whole of the Arabian Peninsula.
Answer: This policy was meant to be a pressure for China to become a democratic country and to make the U.S. be seen as an role model. It was an ideological battle that USA had to grant the propaganda was being made in the right way, so they would show the strenght of their policies in an economical and social way. The biggest disadvantage was not being able to participate on tradings with a country that was changing and growing so fast it was almost becoming the largest market in the world. Economically, the U.S. had to think again on their strategies or they would face a fierce rival.
This strategy was proven to be useless since USA opened up in the 1970's for trading with China again, and this country continues to develop its economy even having a communist government. The socialist market policy didn't lead to democracy as the U.S. thought. Having this in mind, in my opinion there's no point in mantaining this kind of thought that only shows the American dream is to conquer countries by imposing their way of thinking and considering only their point of view as the right thing to do.
