1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oliga [24]
3 years ago
13

196. If a man put out the eye of another man, his eye shall be put out.

History
1 answer:
Mashcka [7]3 years ago
6 0

Your answer would be D) Mesopotamians believed in the "eye for an eye" approach to justice. The phrase "eye for an eye" means someone that does something to another person should be penalized in a similar matter. And most of the laws have people's consequences relating to the actions that they made.

The answer is NOT (A) because there were classes during their time period.

The answer is NOT (B) because there were rules, and the rules were from The Code of Hammurabi.

The answer is NOT (C) because in Law #205, it says, " If the slave of a freed man strike the body of a freed man, his ear shall be cut off." But, if it were the opposite way, the free man strikes the slave, the free man wouldn't be as punished like the slave.

You might be interested in
World history what social classes existed in ancient egypt
Anastaziya [24]

A group in a society that is ranked by factors such as wealth, property, and rights

6 0
3 years ago
The idea of laissez faire in president hoovers 1932 campaign platform was that
gregori [183]

The government should stay out of economic issues. - Apex

4 0
3 years ago
Why was the war with America unpopular with many Englishmen? The colonists were Englishmen, with relatives in England. France's
Andru [333]

Answer:

The war lasted longer and cost more than the king had expected and promised.

Many English people wanted the colonies to be independent so they would be free of the burden of supporting them.

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In at least 100 to 150 words, explain mutual defense alliances and critique the role they played in starting World War I.
taurus [48]

Answer:

Mutual defense alliances was a significant cause for starting World War I. Basically, what happened was all of the countries were somehow alliances with other countries. Conflict between different countries caused the allied countries to be involved which eventually led to World War I.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(Multiple Choice, 45 pts)
Dima020 [189]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

i really am not sure about this

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did people undertake pilgrimages during the Middle Ages?
    14·1 answer
  • Please help meeeee
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following best defines a gene pool?
    10·1 answer
  • A republic is a form of government in which the people
    9·2 answers
  • Which was the biggest flaw to the articles of Confederation
    5·1 answer
  • How might the need to "balance the ticket" affect the choice for vice presidential candidate?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following acts repealed part of the Missouri Compromise?
    9·2 answers
  • Taizu’s military regained control over which area?
    8·2 answers
  • Helppppp!!!Plzzzzzzz!!!!!!
    6·1 answer
  • Memorial day was originally created to honor fallen soldiers of which war? world war i.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!