Answer:
A line in a poem is very similar to a sentence in an essay.
Explanation:
Both are building blocks to the final product: the poem or the essay.
Answer:
Explanation: ( Children of Literate Parents perform better in School than those of Illiterate Parents.)
A literate parent is a parent who can read and write and is educated in a particular area of knowledge. An illiterate parent is a person who cannot read and write. When we say that children of literate parents perform better in school than those of illiterate parents, it means that they perform well than those of illiterate parents.Children of illiterate parents have a good foundation and proper upbringing from their early stage in life. Literate parents send their children to a standard school because they know the value of education. They will always want the best for their children unlike those that are illiterate parents. Literate parents know the value of education. They try all possible means to give their children a standard education. They provide all the materials needed for their children to assimilate in class. They try to touch them at home and help their children in doing their assignments which help the students academically.Also, literate parents are passionate and concerned with the academic performances of their children. They give them all the necessary materials needed for them well in their various schools. They check their books every day to make sure they are doing well in school. An illiterate parent that did not know how to read and write may not even think of checking the notes of their children talkless of reminding them to read their books.
Intelligence is innate and it is transferred from parents to their children. A parent that is not educated is likely to pass the intelligent quotations to their children.
<span>I would say Mr. Mead's house is different from all the other houses in the city in two specific ways. The first way that Mr. Mead's house is different is that it is brightly lit. All the lights..</span>
Answer:
It depends on the matter, such as how Susan B Anthony broke the law of being a woman voting in my eyes such thing is silly to be a law and to be arrested for, other matters such as murder, theft, and plenty of other things should never be okay to break the law for. I would only break the law over things I feel is ridiculous and it should be done such as what Susan did when she voted, I would've also voted as a woman because she did nothing wrong in my opinion. I may not have much personal experience so let's instead look at Rosa Parks who was arrested because she wouldn't give her seat up to a white person, heck I most certainly would not have to, when Rosa broke that "law" of not getting off her seat for the white person she did nothing wrong in that act but was still arrested for it and again in my eyes she did not do anything wrong by breaking that law.
Explanation:
Hope this helps i wrote it off the top of my head :) stay safe!!
<u>Answer:</u>
The sequence of key ideas is as follows:
- Travel by land and water were solved in the nineteenth century.
- The twentieth century will solve the problem of flight.
- Wind resistance is a concern that needs to be solved.
- Wilbur and Orville confirm the existence of tangential force.
- Wilbur estimates they will need at least an engine weighing one hundred pounds.
- He estimates the first flying machine will only reach low speeds.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Key idea 1 introduces the main idea of travel and states that land and water travel were taken care of in the nineteenth century, leaving air travel by implication, which is stated in the next idea. It is further elaborated in detail in the third point which explains the aspect of the problem that needed to be solved. The fourth idea introduces Wilbur and Orville and states their findings on the existence of tangential force, elaborating the former's estimates in the fifth and sixth key points.
