<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
What is the question though?
Answer:
The fewest or the minority of the population scores below 70 in an intelligence test.
Explanation:
Intelligence Quotient is a type of test which is designed to estimate the human intelligence. It is the sum of the scores of various standardized tests.
Therefore in an IQ test, about two-third of the majority population scores between 85-115. Whereas, about 2.5 percent of the minority population scores above 130 or below 70.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Since the globalization creates an interconnected world, one country has power to affect others as well, and United states tries to control the region to fulfill their interests and do good for American Citizens. But it becomes impossible for them to control when they fail in getting the influence in the area.
- For example: Since, 20 years US is trying to get hold on Talibans but have failed miserably, which made manufacturing of the drugs easy and transferring them into the US.
The <span>knapp's stages of relationship termination in which couples tend to </span>decrease both the quality and frequency of their interactions is: <span>Circumscribing
During this stages, couples tend to limit every interaction possible with another due to their unconscious desire to stay apart from one another</span>
