1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tresset [83]
3 years ago
12

How did rulers use religion to support/justify their positions?

History
1 answer:
jonny [76]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: Generally speaking, rulers throughout history have used religion to add a touch of spiritual legitimacy to their rule. Think of it this way, if it's widely believed that a king or queen has been appointed by God, that makes it so much more difficult to challenge them. After all, in such a political environment, by challenging the ruler you're also challenging God, and that's not just treason, but blasphemy.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
To what areas of the world did europe extend its powers after 1870?
Usimov [2.4K]
In the Age of New Imperialism that began in the 1870s, European states established vast empires mainly in Africa, but also in Asia and the Middle East. - https://www.tamaqua.k12.pa.us/cms/lib07/PA01000119/Centricity/Domain/119/TheAgeofImperialism.pdf
4 0
3 years ago
Explain the rational as to why people created government
nata0808 [166]

Answer:

Explanation:

Problem Solving

Identifying Basic Rights

Think of a right you believe all people should have. For example, you probably agree that everyone in the United States has the right to be protected from robbers and burglars. The belief that everyone should have this protection is shared by most people in the United States. We hear about it on television, in the newspaper, and in discussions.

Individually or in small groups, explain how you think rights like the one you have identified can be protected.

Defining "Natural Rights"

Most people in the American colonies believed that everyone had a right to life, liberty, and property. These rights were called natural rights. (Sometimes these are now called basic rights or fundamental rights.) The idea of natural rights means that all persons have these rights just because they are human beings. Everyone is born with these rights and they should not be taken away without a person's agreement.

Many of the Founders believed people receive these rights from God. Others believed that people have them just because it is natural for people to have them.

John Locke was a famous English philosopher. He lived from 1632 to 1704. He had written a book called Two Treatises of Civil Government (1690). In that book he wrote about natural rights. He said that the main purpose of government should be to protect the people's natural rights. He also said that kings should not have absolute power, that is, power without limits. They should not be able to deprive people of their natural rights.

Many Americans had read Locke's book, and they agreed with what it said about government. Those who had not actually read Locke's book knew his ideas from newspapers, political pamphlets, church sermons, and discussions.

Protecting Natural Rights

Although people agreed on certain natural rights, they worried about how those rights could be protected. Locke and others thought about what life would be like in a situation where there was no government and no laws. They called this situation a state of nature. They were afraid that in a state of nature their rights would be taken away.

Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules.

Problem Solving

It's your turn to think like a philosopher

Imagine what life might be like in a state of nature. Think what your classroom might be like if there were no rules. Think what might happen if the teacher didn't have the right to tell anyone what to do.

Work together in groups of about five to answer the following questions about such a situation. Then choose a person to explain your answers to the rest of the class. Then compare your answers with John Locke's which follow.

What might be the advantages and disadvantages of living in a state of nature?

What might happen to people's rights?

What might life be like for everyone?

Compare Your List with John Locke's

You may have seen the same disadvantages in a state of nature that John Locke saw. Locke believed:

The stronger and smarter people might try to take away other people's lives, liberty, or property.

Weaker people might band together and take away the rights of the stronger and smarter people.

People would be unprotected and insecure.

The Social Compact

John Locke and other philosophers developed a solution to the problems that exist in a place without government. In a state of nature, people might feel free to do anything they want to do. However, their rights would not be protected and they would feel insecure.

Locke argued that people should agree with one another to give up some of their freedom in exchange for protection and security. They should consent to follow some laws in exchange for the protection that these laws would give them. This agreement is called a social compact or social contract. A social compact is an agreement people make among themselves to create a government to rule them and protect their natural rights. In this agreement the people consent to obey the laws created by that government.

In a later lesson, you will study the Declaration of Independence. You will see how the Founders included all of the ideas you have studied in this lesson in the Declaration.

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was the owner of the New York Journal
weeeeeb [17]

Answer:

William Randolph Hearst

Explanation:

The Journal-American was the product of a merger between two New York newspapers owned by William Randolph Hearst

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What soviet leader's reforms led to the end of the cold war??
irina [24]
It was the internal reforms of Mikhail Gorbachev, the last Soviet leader that led to the end of the Cold War
7 0
3 years ago
What does Lincoln say about the nature of the speech he made when he first took office, four years earlier?
ikadub [295]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached we can answer the following.

You do not specify what speech you are referring to. We are going to assume that you are talking about his inauguration speech.

If that is the case, Abraham Lincoln wanted at all cost to prevent a war in the states due to the division of the country. He would try to avoid the battle confrontation that unfortunately ended up being the American Civil War.

In the speech, Abraham Lincoln tried to convince people to form the South that they were responsible for the growing conflict in the United States by defending slavery when he expressed that "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war."

Some historians believe that Abraham Lincoln made everything that was in his hands to avoid the war, and once the war had started, to end it. He suffered for the secession of the states that formed the Confederation and that he aspired to prompt reconciliation that made the states be back as part of the Union.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was life like for peasants under the Tokugawa Shogunate?
    9·1 answer
  • Fortunately the people who live in rural African areas have greater access to education.
    8·1 answer
  • One reason powerful nations rushed to grab colonies in the 1800s was the desire (1 point)for raw materials and natural resources
    7·1 answer
  • Animal skins were to help keep people warm. (burned/sewn)
    10·2 answers
  • Which description of the Atlantic Charter and t\he Yalta Conference is correct?
    7·2 answers
  • Where did the mycenaean come from
    5·1 answer
  • Whose viewpoint does this excerpt reflect?
    5·2 answers
  • ASAP HELP NOW
    8·1 answer
  • Explain in 1-2 complete sentences why the colonists in Maryland didn't want to pay the king's taxes after the French and Indian
    5·1 answer
  • I choose the best answer Aner World War II, the United States and Soviet Union engaged in the War tron Nuclear Cold​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!