The Congress failed to repeal the Affordable Care Act, enact immigration reform, or limit ownership of handguns because a lack of public consensus on each issue the public has been strongly divided.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is referred to as the Affordable Care Act or “ACA” which is for short, is the comprehensive health care reform law which was enacted in March 2010. Thus, this law has three primary goals which make the affordable health insurance available to more people.
However, the people would thus ideally, like to think that members of Congress are responding to the public opinion. Thus, the people who don't own guns think the opposite, they think guns are dangerous.
Hence, the Affordable Care Act was also known as the health care law.
To learn more about the Affordable Care Act here:
brainly.com/question/29398295
#SPJ4
<span>Yes the United States federal government
should reduce the progressive income tax rates in favor of an introduction of a
regressive national sales tax. Hence, since U.S progressive income tax means
income redistribution that most taxes are used to fund social welfare programs
however only a small portion of government spending is devoted to welfare
payments. Example of this progressive taxes reduction is the sales tax. Moreover,
If the two individuals buy the same amount of goods or services, the sales tax
constitute a higher percentage of the lower-earning individual’s wages and a lower
percentage of the higher-earning individual’s wages. </span>
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.
In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.
During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
Answer:
We all know Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, but he actually wasn't in the original list of Santa's reindeer names in "Twas The Night Before Christmas." Of course, other versions of the names have also been published over the years, including Donner and Blitzen. And Rudolph came later, popularized by the song and film.Explanation:
