Answer:
Jewish people outside Israel
Explanation:
In <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
<h3>What was the place of evidence in the case of Mapp v. Ohio?</h3>
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the state in a 5-3 vote, favoring Mapp, from whom evidence was obtained without due process.
The implication is that evidence seized unlawfully from a suspect or an accused, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.
Thus, in <em>Mapp v. Ohio</em>, the Supreme Court ruled <u>B. If the police</u> violate the law to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against an accused person in court.
Learn more about the importance of evidence in criminal prosecutions at brainly.com/question/7802791
#SPJ1
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
They earned it through nobility and serving the king.
D. Science Fiction...............
Constitutional principle of rule of law dictates that all individuals, institutions and organizations (whether its privately held or publicly held), Even the State itself, are accountable to laws. No matter what ethnicity or social status that a person has, that person need to face equal treatment of the law like any others. 5.0
