1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kolezko [41]
4 years ago
7

Should nationwide be bound to the settlement why or why not rule of laws

History
1 answer:
zhannawk [14.2K]4 years ago
8 0
Personally, i believe that nationwide should not be bound to the settlement.
the main purpose of the settlement is to attract a lot of people from all over the world that came with various culture and ethnicity to populate and generte the economy within the certain area.
Of course, during the beginning of the settlement process, the Area will tend to be lawless and a lot of crimes might occur. It might get worse before it got better.
You might be interested in
Why did most african americans voters support the republican party?
FromTheMoon [43]
They voted republican because the republicans supported their rights. They were taking action to get them their rights. <span />
5 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is not a power of the president?
vlabodo [156]
C, Vote to impeach a government official. The president's powers are way far superior, and a government official is under a separate jurisdiction and management which is lower than that of the president,
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is anthrax a bioterrorism threat?
Fynjy0 [20]

Explanation:era  ditcadro

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the early social reform movements influence the women's rights movement?
Rom4ik [11]

Answer:

Future leaders of the women’s rights movement got their start working for social reform movements such as abolition and temperance

Explanation:

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What did the napoleonic code have in common with the principle of the enlightenment?
fgiga [73]
<span> it ensured that careers would be open on the basis of merit and not privileges of birth.
It did not guarantee women equal rights but confirmed the existing supremacy of men over women; women had fewer rights than children.
It didn't either enshrine individual rights or the security of the state- there was a balance. </span>
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which was a direct result of European slave trade in Africa
    10·2 answers
  • Which political party wanted to stop the spread of slavery into new territories in Western lands?
    5·2 answers
  • Arguement about Boston Massacre
    11·1 answer
  • How was World War One differ from previous wars
    15·2 answers
  • The Green Mountain Boys, who captured the British-held Fort Ticonderoga, were led by
    11·2 answers
  • True or false: More than half of all languages come from Asia and the Pacific Islands.
    5·2 answers
  • -Born in Virginia
    7·1 answer
  • What would a blitzkrieg entail?
    11·2 answers
  • In the United States, potential jury members are notified of their duty by
    9·2 answers
  • What was the long-term impact of the work of Bernardino de Sahagún?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!