The Plain Meaning Rule.
The plain meaning rule states that when the language is unambiguous and clear, you must use the actual language of the contract and not any outside evidence when determining how the dispute is resolved.
Answer:
Cost of completed units = $158,240
Explanation:
<em>Cost of completed units = Cost per equivalent unit × no of units</em>
<em>Equivalent unit = Degree of completion × units of work</em>
<em>Equivalent units of material</em>
( 9200× 100%) + (3000×100%) = 12,200 unit
Cost per equivalent unit of material = $97,600/12,200 units= $8
<em>Equivalent units of labour and overhead</em>
(9200× 100%) + (3000× 25%) = 750
Cost per equivalent unit of labour and overhead
=( 73,630+17910)/9950
=$9.2
Cost of completed units
= $(9.2+8)× 9,200 = 158,240
Cost of completed units = $158,240
Answer:
can revoke the contract as informal verbal agreements are not binding
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that sherry would pay her $5,000 in the case when she runs marathon now once she starts running so here alan can revoke the contract legally as there is only verbal agreements not the written agreement also they are not binding to each other
So as per the given situation, the above statement should be considered
The proportion of the optimal risky portfolio that should be invested in stock A is 0%.
Using this formula
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=[(Wa-RFR )×SDB²]-[(Wb-RFR)×SDA×SDB×CC] ÷ [(Wa-RFR )×SDB²+(Wb-RFR)SDA²]- [(Wa-RFR +Wb-RFR )×SDA×SDB×CC]
Where:
Stock A Expected Return (Wa) =16%
Stock A Standard Deviation (SDA)= 18.0%
Stock B Expected Return (Wb)= 12%
Stock B Standard Deviation(SDB) = 3%
Correlation Coefficient for Stock A and B (CC) = 0.50
Risk Free rate of return(RFR) = 10%
Let plug in the formula
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=[(.16-.10)×.03²]-[(.12-.10)×.18×.03×0.50]÷ [(.16-.10 )×.03²+(.12-.10)×.18²]- [(.16-.10 +.12-.10 )×.18×.03×0.50]
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=(0.000054-0.000054)÷(0.000702-0.000216)
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=0÷0.000486×100%
Stock A optimal risky portfolio=0%
Inconclusion the proportion of the optimal risky portfolio that should be invested in stock A is 0%.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/21273560
Answer:
The Number of warehouses completed would not be a rational base for allocating overhead costs to the warehouses.
Explanation:
For allocating the overhead cost to the warehouse. Following things need to be considered.
1. Square footage of the warehouses : Based on the square foot of the warehouse, the overhead cost can be easily allocated. As different warehouses have different square foot. So there would be different allocation criteria for each warehouse.
2. Labor Hours : According to the labor hours, the overhead expense can be allocated. In warehouse, the size of labor is matter. As more labors are available, the chances of more allocation expenses would be there and if there is less labors so the allocation expenses would be less.
Depending upon the size of the labors, the allocation of overhead differs.
3. Direct material cost : The warehouse is required when more supplies of material is to be required. So here, direct material plays an very important role while allocating the overhead cost. Depending upon the quantity of material, the overhead expenses differs.
4. Number of warehouses completed : As without knowing the size and capacity of the warehouses, it is difficult to allocate the overhead expense. Moreover, the same cost is been allocated which is not acceptable.
Hence, the Number of warehouses completed would not be a rational base for allocating overhead costs to the warehouses.
