Answer:
No science doesn't teach you everything. science can't explain everything in the world. It may explain a lot but its not explaining everything. somethings are just unexplainable even for scientists.
Explanation:
The answer about empathy and cooperation are inevitable in diversified country like Nepal, is explained below.
Explanation:
When people understand and share the feelings of other people, then this ability of the people is called as empathy.
When people work together and help each other towards a combined end, this is called as cooperation.
So in a country like Nepal, which is full of people from different cultures, religions, ethnicity, etc, the feelings of being empathetic and cooperative with each other is inevitable. People have to interact and cooperate with each other in every field of life in such countries. So they can't ignore the importance of being empathetic and cooperative.
Learn more about Diversity at:
brainly.com/question/685315
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
Attachment;Self concept
Explanation:
If infancy's major social achievement is <u>attachment</u>, childhood's major social achievement is the development of a <u>self concept</u>.
The major achievement of an infant would be the ability to feel attached to his surrounding and people around him. Where as a childs childhood develops his sense of existence and self concept. A child finds his identity and learns the concept of self development.
I hope the answer is helpful.
Thanks
The ~unequal~ statuses of different individuals in a society. for example, a doctor has a higher social status than a janitor working at the same hospital. the doctor might be awarded for his work, while the janitor is mostly ignored. the doctor may also have come from a fairly wealthy family and received a good education, while the janitor may have had economic disadvantages and a poor quality education. so the doctor and the janitor are socially unequal. social inequality is very closely connected to economic inequality, so if you ever see the phrase "socio-economic inequality," that's why.
