1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kompoz [17]
3 years ago
6

Which of the following is an ongoing problem in Brazil? A. a highly educated population with no job market B. class riots betwee

n the wealthy and poor in cities C. a high poverty rate for average citizens D. natural disasters such as tornadoes
History
2 answers:
photoshop1234 [79]3 years ago
5 0

i believe the answer is b

AlexFokin [52]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Its C i believe

Explanation:

i took the quiz a bit ago and i believe that was the answer

You might be interested in
Begin by reflecting on what you already know about global temperature trends. What trends do you expect to see as you plot how t
Leviafan [203]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

According to what I already know about global temperature trends, the trends that I expect to see as I plot how temperatures have changed over time is that it is going to increase probably a little more in the coming years before it starts a period of cooling on the surface of planet earth.

Ye, although it could sound strange at this moment, some Eastern European scientists have announced the coming of a "mini-ice age" in the next 40 or 50 years.

My source of prior knowledge that I consider reliable is the Russian Academy of Sciences. More specifically, the Pulkovo Observatory belongs to the Research Laboratory in St. Petersburg, Russia.

I am referring specifically to the research results published by Dr. Habibullo Abdussamatov, who is the Head of the Space Laboratory for the Russian Agency.

3 0
3 years ago
According to Gribkov, why was Zorin unable to answer Adalai Stevenson’s question about the missiles in Cuba
luda_lava [24]

Answer:

I want to say to you, Mr. Zorin, that I do not have your talent for obfuscation, for distortion, for confusing language, and for doubletalk. And I must confess to you that I am glad that I do not!

But if I understood what you said, you said that my position had changed, that today I was defensive because we did not have the evidence to prove our assertions, that your Government had installed long-range missiles in Cuba.

Well, let me say something to you, Mr. Ambassador—we do have the evidence. We have it, and it is clear and it is incontrovertible. And let me say something else—those weapons must be taken out of Cuba.

Next, let me say to you that, if I understood you, with a trespass on credibility that excels your best, you said that our position had changed since I spoke here the other day because of the pressures of world opinion and the majority of the United Nations. Well, let me say to you, sir, you are wrong again. We have had no pressure from anyone whatsoever. We came in here today to indicate our willingness to discuss Mr. U Thant’s proposals, and that is the only change that has taken place.

But let me also say to you, sir, that there has been a change. You—the Soviet Union has sent these weapons to Cuba. You—the Soviet Union has upset the balance of power in the world. You—the Soviet Union has created this new danger, not the United States.

And you ask with a fine show of indignation why the President did not tell Mr. Gromyko on last Thursday about our evidence, at the very time that Mr. Gromyko was blandly denying to the President that the U.S.S.R. was placing such weapons on sites in the new world.

Well, I will tell you why—because we were assembling the evidence, and perhaps it would be instructive to the world to see how a Soviet official—how far he would go in perfidy. Perhaps we wanted to know if this country faced another example of nuclear deceit like that one a year ago, when in stealth, the Soviet Union broke the nuclear test moratorium.

And while we are asking questions, let me ask you why your Government—your Foreign Minister—deliberately, cynically deceived us about the nuclear build-up in Cuba.

And, finally, the other day, Mr. Zorin, I remind you that you did not deny the existence of these weapons. Instead, we heard that they had suddenly become defensive weapons. But today again if I heard you correctly, you now say that they do not exist, or that we haven’t proved they exist, with another fine flood of rhetorical scorn.

All right, sir, let me ask you one simple question: Do you, Ambassador Zorin, deny that the U.S.S.R. has placed and is placing medium- and intermediate-range missiles and sites in Cuba? Yes or no—don’t wait for the translation—yes or no?

(The Soviet representative refused to answer.)

You can answer yes or no. You have denied they exist. I want to know if I understood you correctly. I am prepared to wait for my answer until hell freezes over, if that’s your decision. And I am also prepared to present the evidence in this room.

(The President called on the representative of Chile to speak, but Ambassador Stevenson continued as follows.)

I have not finished my statement. I asked you a question. I have had no reply to the question, and I will now proceed, if I may, to finish my statement.

I doubt if anyone in this room, except possibly the representative of the Soviet Union, has any doubt about the facts. But in view of his statements and the statements of the Soviet Government up until last Thursday, when Mr. Gromyko denied the existence or any intention of installing such weapons in Cuba, I am going to make a portion of the evidence available right now. If you will indulge me for a moment, we will set up an easel here in the back of the room where I hope it will be visible to everyone.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which statement describes the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?
devlian [24]

Answer:

answer a

Explanation:

cause they wanted to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapon technology.

8 0
2 years ago
How were baby boomers affected by the civil rights movement?
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

They are old fashioned and dont want to change

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
What do they mean by "for" and "against "​
skad [1K]

Answer:

For it and against it

Explanation:

dont really know how to explain it but basically for paragraph one you are writing why you should be for it (in favor of; pro) and for paragraph 2 you are writing why you should be against it (opposed to; con)

hope that helps :)

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why did the findings of Galileo frighten Catholic and Protestant leaders?
    13·1 answer
  • Types of civil disobedience and peaceful protests that were used in order to help move the Civil Rights Movement forward.
    15·1 answer
  • During world war 1 Native Americans were noted for which of these contributions to the war effort
    9·2 answers
  • How did Harriet Tubman contribute to civil rights?
    9·1 answer
  • Ancient rock paintings have been found in _____.
    8·2 answers
  • What was the purpose of the Federal Reserve Act?
    9·2 answers
  • After World War II, an international organization was formed to prevent or resolve any conflicts that threaten international pea
    8·1 answer
  • what is the Social Contract Theory? What are at least two of your personal freedoms that you have given up to be a part of this
    5·1 answer
  • In 1831, which slave led a revolt in Virginia in which nearly 60 white people were killed?
    12·2 answers
  • Compromise /blank/ fails
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!