Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": Dina.
Explanation:
The fact that local theaters near school offer a discount to students with valid identification is not a form of discrimination. As stated by Dina, there is no age restriction, for instance, and it is presumed, there is no other such religious preference, sexual orientation, race, and so forth. Economists are more likely to agree with Dina since what the local theaters are simply trying to do is to get the more clientele possible out of diverse sources. In this case, the source is the student status.
Answer:
$845.83
Explanation:
The computation of the interest is shown below:
= Principal × rate of interest × number of days ÷ (total number of days in a year)
= $140,000 × 7.25% × (30 days ÷ 360 days)
= $845.83
Simply we applied the simple interest formula by multiplying the principal, interest rate and the time period so that it can arrive with the correct amount
Answer: No, because all of the defendant's facilities and offices are in State A.
Explanation:
Following the information given in the question, a federal district court cannot have subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiff's action.
In this case, there's no subject matter jurisdiction by the court as theres subject matter jurisdiction when there is full diversity of citizenship, and the amount of controversy is more tha $75,000.
Answer:
<em>The answer is product, sales, similar products.</em>
Explanation:
Hope This Helps.
Answer:
The line on the graph will be parallel to the pre-subsidy line and the new constraint will then be equal to the points connecting the two lines.
Explanation:
The subsidy by government to single parents is $3 per hour for up to 8 hours. The total of subsidy will be $16 for each day. The labor force who were not receiving the subsidy before had steep indifference curve but now few workers will find utility maximization with flatter indifference curve so the workers will join the subsidy program.
