1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Westkost [7]
3 years ago
9

Suppose that you prefer reading a book you already own to watching TV and that you prefer watching TV to listening to music. If

these are your only three choices, what is the opportunity cost of reading?
a. watching TV and listening to music
b. watching TV
c. listening to music
d. sleeping
e. the price of the book
Business
1 answer:
Irina18 [472]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

B. Watching TV

Explanation:

Opportunity Cost is the cost of <u>next best alternative</u> forgone while choosing an alternative.

Eg: If I can consume apples & oranges, I like apples more than oranges. The opportunity cost of apples consumption is the next best option i.e oranges forgone.

As per given preferences : Book Reading > Watching TV > Listening Music

( '>' refers to preferred over)

The opportunity cost of Book reading is the next best option sacrifised i.e Watching TV.

You might be interested in
During the Reagan administration, the Laffer curve was used to argue that: a. lower income tax rates could increase tax revenues
solniwko [45]

Answer:

A) lower income tax rates could increase tax revenues.

Explanation:

The laffer curve is a theoretical model which argues that there a tax rate that theoretically produces the most revenue for the government. Said tax rate is between 0% and 100%.

President Reagan used this model to argue that a lower tax rate would actually increase government revenue. The logic behind this claim was that lower tax rates increases both public and private saving, which in turn increases investment, resulting in more economic growth, and more taxable income.

The validity of these claims is dispute and is subject to debate among economists.

6 0
3 years ago
Nutech Corp. is expecting the following cash flows—$79,000, $112,000, $164,000, $84,000, and $242,000—over the next five years.
Alja [10]

Answer:

$429,560

Explanation:

Present value will be calculated through the PV formula,

PV = \frac{C1}{1+r}  + \frac{C2}{(1+r)^{2} } + \frac{C3}{(1+r)^{3}} + \frac{C4}{(1+r)^{4}} + \frac{C5}{(1+r)^{5}}

r = 15%

C1 = $79,000 ,C2 = $112,000 ,C3 = $164,000 ,C4 = $84,000 ,C5 = $242,000

Substituting the values in the formula,

PV = \frac{79,000}{1.15}  + \frac{112,000}{(1.15)^{2} } + \frac{164,000}{(1.15)^{3}} + \frac{84,000}{(1.15)^{4}} + \frac{242,000}{(1.15)^{5}}

PV = 68,695.66 + 84,688 + 107,838 + 48,030.2 + 120,338.14

PV = $429,560

The present value of the cash flows of Nutech Corp. over the next five years is $429,560.

8 0
3 years ago
Consider the following two mutually exclusive projects: Year Cash Flow (A) Cash Flow (B) 0 –$218,917 –$16,419 1 25,700 5,985 2 5
Kryger [21]

Answer:

The IRR (in %) for Project A is 31%.

Explanation:

Let IRR be x%

At IRR, present value of inflows = present value of outflows.  

218917 = 25700/1.0x + 53000/1.0x^2 + 58000/1.0x^3 + 420,000/1.0x^4

solving for x, we find:

x = 31%

Therefore, The IRR (in %) for Project A is 31%.

5 0
3 years ago
ECON Good morning can someone answer this please asap
dusya [7]
The answer is B because both have access to capital that competitive markets wouldn’t give them because they dominate the market place and drive out competitors
5 0
2 years ago
"The nature and purpose of the public sector result in a unique organizational characteristics". Discuss
alex41 [277]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although the question is incomplete because it does not provide the location, country, or any other further reference, we can say the following.

The nature and purpose of the public sector result in unique organizational characteristics, basically in the formation of bureaucracies that are a form of governmental and administrative organizations with many employees and hierarchies that more that improve management and operations, complicate it and make it slow due to the fact that the number of people working is numerous.

Experts say that this is not the more efficient and effective form of managing governmental offices. On the contrary, it is slow and inefficient.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why might some firms voluntarily pay workers a wage above the market equilibrium
    9·1 answer
  • A company pays its employees $4,000 each Friday, which amounts to $800 per day for the five-day workweek that begins on Monday.
    9·1 answer
  • As you get up to snag more cheese puffs and soda, a commercial comes on that is substantially louder than the volume of the TV s
    5·1 answer
  • In terms of team rewards and recognition, skill-based pay works well with ______.
    9·1 answer
  • Professor Shethinks Shesverybusy needs to allocate time this week for office appointments, so she needs to forecast the number o
    8·1 answer
  • Ronald, Jamie, Ben, and Joseph are colleagues who want to start a company of their own. All of them want to be actively involved
    11·1 answer
  • Money is a limited resource. true or false
    8·2 answers
  • Department C had direct materials EUP cost of $4.00 and conversion EUP cost of $2.50. If the department had 38,000 units complet
    5·2 answers
  • Manufactured truck parts are part of which industry
    7·2 answers
  • The minimum selling price that should be acceptable in a special order situation is equal to total Select one: a. production cos
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!