Answer:
During the American Revolutionary War, the United States confronted Great Britain with the objective of consolidating its independence and stop being a group of British colonies to be a free and unified nation.
Thus, between 1775 and 1783 a large number of battles arose between both sides, after which the United States completely separated itself from the British, who were defeated. But the United States was not alone in the conflict, but had allies that, to a greater and lesser extent, influenced the American victory in the conflict. Thus, France and Spain were the main collaborators with America in the war, with various indigenous tribes participating to a lesser extent.
France and Spain entered the war after the Battle of Saratoga, which occurred between September and October 1777 and culminated in an American victory. Thus, France participated with its troops in iconic battles such as Yorktown in 1781, in addition to blocking the main British ports both in Europe and in America. In turn, Spain exerted pressure and lent collaboration both of troops and resources from its southern colonies, especially from Texas.
Answer:
The Founding Fathers established it in the Constitution, in part, as a compromise between the election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens
Explanation:
Answer:
<em><u>In each of these cases, President Donald Trump is attempting to block the examination of his conduct, by claiming that the chief executive is immune from various forms of investigation. At stake in these cases is the public’s ability to know about, and seek accountability for, misconduct. More important, they represent a gut check for our system of separation of powers. </u></em>
Answer: Locke and Rousseau would be most likely to support a <u>change of government brought about by the people</u>.
You might say this means they would support a <u>revolution</u> by the people against a bad government ... and to an extent that is true. We might want to be cautious, however, in ascribing too much revolutionary fervor to either of those two philosophers. Both of them were writing philosophy about how the people should be the sovereign power in a state -- that a government gets its power from the people and needs to serve the interests of the people. So in theory, they support the people's right to remove a government that has become tyrannical and replace it with a government that works properly on behalf of the people. But neither Locke nor Rousseau was personally advocating violent revolution. American colonists took up arms against Britain in response to their sort of philosophy (especially Locke's). And the bourgeoisie in France started the movement that became the French Revolution based on thoughts in both Lock and Rousseau. But as Enlightenment thinkers, both men ideally hoped to convince others by means of their arguments that a constitutional form of government was the best idea (Locke), or even that direct democracy was the right way for a state to operate (Rousseau).
The federal government and the 50 states <span />
