Since this is a right triangle, you can use the main trig functions sin, cos, and tan. We must use sin for this problem because sin= opp/hyp. Plug in the numbers to this function. Sin (53) = a/25. Thus when you cross multiply, you get a= sin (53) x 25. When you plug it into a calculator the answer should come out to 19.97
No. He added 14/8 cups, or 1 and 3/4th cup.
Arlen already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has two pairs of congruent angles and a pair of congruent included sides, which meet the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
<h3>What is the ASA Congruence Criterion?</h3>
The ASA Congruence Criterion states that for two triangles to be considered congruent to each other, both triangles must have a pair of congruent included sides and two pairs of congruent angles.
Thus, the two-column proof that shows that RS ≅ TU that Arlen is trying to write, has already established that ΔRST and ΔUTS has the following:
Two pairs of congruent angles - ∠RST ≅ ∠UTS and ∠RTS ≅ ∠UST.
A pair of congruent included sides - ST ≅ S.
These satisfy the ASA Congruence Criterion. Therefore:
- the missing statement in the proof is: ΔRST ≅ ΔUTS
- the missing reason in the proof is: ASA Congruence Criterion
Learn more about the ASA Congruence Criterion on:
brainly.com/question/11637992
Answer:
23
Step-by-step explanation:
Suppose,
the first number = x
the second number = x+1
the third number = x+1+1 = x+2
Question wise,
x+x+1+x+2 = 72
3x+3 = 72
3x = 72-3 = 69
x = 69/3 = 23
so the numbers are,
23,(23+1)=24 and (23+2)=25
He read 2/3 on friday and 4/3 on Saturday (I turned it into a top heavy fraction). He read 2/3 more on Saturday