What was the significance or importance of the battle of Lexington and the battle of concord?

History

1 answer:

melomori [17]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The significance or importance of the battle of Lexington and the battle of concord is discussed below.

Explanation:

The Battle of Lexington was significant because it was the informal origin of the Revolutionary War.
This was the primary point the colonial company attacked the British troops.
After the struggle happened at Lexington, the British marched on to attack at Concord.
The importance of the battle was that success upon the British was surprising and presented the Colonists with the courage and confidence in their capability to succeed more successfully.

You might be interested in

What was the housing called that most poor people lived in called in the city

Angelina_Jolie [31]

It is the projest or as in these days we call it "The Hood"

plz plz plz plz mark as brainliest!!!!!

7 0

4 years ago

Item 11

Otrada [13]

Answer:

Alexander Hamilton

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

PLEASE I REALLY NEED HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST

LenaWriter [7]

Answer:

Terrence Taft

Explanation:

The other two candidates have some sort of experience. Edgar was active in politics and Rebecca was a senator for 5 years

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The Magna Carta and the English Bill of Rights contributed most directly to the American system of government by

ladessa [460]

In 1215, a band of rebellious medieval barons forced King John of England to agree to a laundry list of concessions later called the Great Charter, or in Latin, Magna Carta. Centuries later, America’s Founding Fathers took great inspiration from this medieval pact as they forged the nation’s founding documents—including the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

For 18th-century political thinkers like Benjamin Franklin and Thomas Jefferson, Magna Carta was a potent symbol of liberty and the natural rights of man against an oppressive or unjust government. The Founding Fathers’ reverence for Magna Carta had less to do with the actual text of the document, which is mired in medieval law and outdated customs, than what it represented—an ancient pact safeguarding individual liberty.

“For early Americans, Magna Carta and the Declaration of Independence were verbal representations of what liberty was and what government should be—protecting people rather than oppressing them,” says John Kaminski, director of the Center for the Study of the American Constitution at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. “Much in the same way that for the past 100 years the Statue of Liberty has been a visual representation of freedom, liberty, prosperity and welcoming.”

When the First Continental Congress met in 1774 to draft a Declaration of Rights and Grievances against King George III, they asserted that the rights of the English colonists to life, liberty and property were guaranteed by “the principles of the English constitution,” a.k.a. Magna Carta. On the title page of the 1774 Journal of The Proceedings of The Continental Congress is an image of 12 arms grasping a column on whose base is written “Magna Carta.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What challenge did newly independent countries have to face as a result of unchanged colonial boundaries?

Digiron [165]

Answer:

The boundaries put together people who had no desire for independence.

Explanation:

Have a nice day!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers