Answer:
The answer is "No"
Explanation:
With the end of the Cold War, researchers found religions development as a ground breaking political power in the contemporary world however it might have been there from the start.
Similarly as there isn't simple approach to characterize religion, so there is no relapse examination conceivable to state when religion is a significant reason alone, when it is a significant however auxiliary reason, and when it is a guise used to encourage war. History is, all things considered, not a science. Yet, religion, when used by a state, causes battle to appear to be good by legitimating it as in reason, declaring that murdering is morally supported, and giving comfort to the dispossessed.
The Butler Act<span> was a 1925 Tennessee law prohibiting public school teachers from denying the Biblical account of mankind's origin.
Your answer is The Butler Act.</span>
Answer:
Missouri
Explanation:
<em>in </em><em>2</em><em>0</em><em>1</em><em>8</em><em> </em><em>Missouri</em><em> </em><em>had </em><em>a </em><em>total </em><em>summer</em><em> </em><em>capacity</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>2</em><em>1</em><em>,</em><em>0</em><em>7</em><em>8</em><em> </em><em>MW </em><em>through</em><em> </em><em>all </em><em>of </em><em>it's</em><em> </em><em>power </em><em>plants </em><em>and </em><em>a </em><em>net </em><em>generation</em><em> </em><em>of </em><em>8</em><em>5</em><em>,</em><em>0</em><em>9</em><em>5</em><em> </em><em>Missouri</em><em> </em><em>electrical</em><em> </em><em>energy</em><em> </em><em>generation</em><em> </em><em>mix </em><em>in </em><em>may </em><em>2</em><em>0</em><em>2</em><em>0</em><em> </em><em>was </em><em>6</em><em>7</em><em>%</em><em> </em><em>coal </em><em>7</em><em>%</em><em> </em><em>natural</em><em> </em><em>gas</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>8</em><em>%</em><em> </em><em>nuclear</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>0</em><em>%</em><em> </em><em>hydrochloride</em><em> </em><em>and </em><em>6</em><em>%</em><em> </em><em>other</em><em> </em><em>renewables</em>
Answer:
Explanation:
1. What or who do the people underneath the tracks represent?
The farmers' plight ( the farmers problem) shows that the farmer is at the mercy of the railroad and that the farmer is trying to warn the businessman (investors) but as you see with the one who is reading the paper no one is paying the farmer any attention. The people being held down by the tracks don't seem to care.
2. Why do you think the cartoonist portrayed the tracks in this way?
Because the tracks are cutting through the farmland causing "The Farmers Plight" (plight=problem). The railroads caused the prices of their crops to drop, the farmers had to mortgage out their farms to buy more land to produce more crops (still bringing in less money), banks were foreclosing, the land took a huge hit and became less sustainable for crops and while all of the hardship fell on the "normal" folk/farm folk the railroads were monopolizing off of the hardship.
