Answer: Historiography for the Purpose of Nationalism.
Explanation:
The emergence of nationalism in a world dating back to the late eighteenth century. Get your full swing in the next two. Nationalism is reflected through all pores of political, social and scientific life. The emergence of nationalism also reflected on historiography.
Many historians have been encouraged by nationalism. Many of these works have emerged as a result of these tendencies. It is often a syndrome of lesser value because myths characterize most of these historical works. Their scientific value is also called into question. The historian must be objective when writing. The question is, where does this phenomenon come from? Nationalism in historiography seeks to portray, one national entity as larger than another. That is, to minorize another. A patriot historian can be objective, unlike a nationalist.
After doing some research, I believe the choices for this question are the following:
<span>Both empires shared like laws and traditions.
Both empires originated in Western Europe.
Both empires required all citizens to be fluent in Latin.
Both empires considered the emperor the ultimate religious authority.
Among these statements, the one that describes a similarity between the Byzantine and Roman Empire is: </span>Both empires shared like laws and traditions.
Answer:
Hunter-gatherers were prehistoric nomadic groups that harnessed the use of fire, developed intricate knowledge of plant life and refined technology for hunting and domestic purposes as they spread from Africa to Asia, Europe and beyond.
Explanation:
Reflects the idea that government rests on the consent of the governed
