Answer:
True.
Explanation:
‘Cash Flow Statement’ is one of major financial statement that indicates the inflow and outflow of cash along with the reasons by categorizing each cash transaction in three activities i.e., operating, investing or financing activity. Non-cash transactions are not considered while preparing a cash flow statement.
The cash flow from operating activities is generally more than the net income after taxes.
The cash flow from operating activities includes only the cash transactions relating to the operations of the business. It ignores the non-cash transactions. On the other hand, net income is derived after deducting all the expenses (paid or unpaid) from the revenue earned, pertaining to a particular period.
Example: Depreciation expense is a non-cash transaction. It is treated as follows:
While calculating cash flow from operating activities, depreciation expense is ignored (added back to the net income) as it is a non-cash transaction.
On the other hand, depreciation expense pertaining to the accounting period is deducted from revenue to calculate net income after taxes.
Thus, the cash flow from operations is generally more than the net income after taxes.
Answer:
a. Describe how the average accounting return is usually calculated and describe the information this measure provides about a sequence of cash flows. What is the AAR criterion decision rule?
Average accounting return = average net income / average investment
The problem with AAR is that net cash flows are not equal to net income since depreciation expense and changes in net working capital are not accounted for by AAR.
The criterion decision rule is that projects with an AAR above a certain measure.
b. What are the problems associated with using the AAR as a means of evaluating a project’s cash flows? What underlying feature of AAR is most troubling to you from a financial perspective? Does the AAR have any redeeming qualities?
it doesn't consider net cash flows, nor time value of money. Personally, accounting is an extremely important tool but it only reflects a partial perspective of a business. E.g. a business might have a huge net income but if it doesn't have enough cash to function, it will go bankrupt. In finance, cash is king.
Personally, my biggest problem with AAR is that it doesn't consider net cash flows. I've been on situations where the company I worked for was apparently doing great, but our accounts receivables were huge and we couldn't collect money fast enough. My job was basically go to different banks and convince them of loaning us cash. The worst part was that even without being able to collect cash, we still had to pay taxes and that was another huge problem.
I believe that AAR is still used because of its simplicity. Also, taxes are paid based on accounting profits and many firms base they compensation plans on them.
<span>Three good indicators of just how well a company's present strategy is working are:
</span>1.Whether the company is acquiring new customers at an attractive rate as well as <span>retaining existing customers
</span><span>2.Whether the company is achieving its financial and strategic objectives and whether it is an above-average industry performer.
</span>3.Whether the firm’s image and reputation with its customers are growing stronger orweake
Answer:
$ 90000
Explanation:
Given :
The normal selling price of an industrial solvent by Wilson Corporation = $ 100 per barrel.
The variable cost per barrel = $ 40
Total fixed cost of the company = $ 900,000 per month.
Number of barrels in excess = 30,000 per month
Number of barrels the buyer wants to buy = 5000 barrels
New fixed cost = $ 60,000
The increased variable cost is $ 10 per barrel over the normal variable cost.
Now if this special order is accepted, the operating income of the company would increase by an amount of $ 90,000.
