Answer:
Yes.
Explanation:
<em>According to G00GLE, and I quote*: " The Minnesota Supreme Court's canon of judicial conduct prohibiting candidates for judicial election from announcing their views on disputed legal and political issues violates the First Amendment. "</em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em></em>
<em>* </em><em>thanks to Cornell Law School for the awesome answer, all credit due there. </em>
The extent that Lucille can be regarded as a rebel woman is from the fact that she rose above stereotypes to great positions as a woman.
<h3>Who was lucille Mathurin Mair?</h3>
This was a Jamaican woman that was a gender specialist, author and diplomat.
Lucille was an advisor on women affairs and she lend her voice to a lot of issues that concerned women during her time as a public servant.
Read more on Lucille Mathurin here:brainly.com/question/9610610
The <span>excerpt from “Pakistan’s Malala” that shows Malala’s viewpoint is </span>"[S]he began believing that she was stronger than the things that scared her.The reason that is why she was disappointed is that it was because her school was likely closed permanently.
The mention of some rights in the constitution should not be understood to reject or degrade those held by the people. This assertion is correct.
The Rights Retained by the People helps us understand why and how this inequality in human rights protection has developed. It also provides a foundation for reforming constitutional interpretation and better protecting all human rights by emphasizing the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution.
The enumeration of some rights in the Constitution should not be understood to negate or degrade others possessed by people. It states that any rights not expressly granted by the Constitution belong to the people, not the government. In other words, people's rights are not confined to the rights enshrined in the Constitution.
To learn more about Rights Retained
brainly.com/question/28235501
#SPJ4