Answer:
she has formed a cognitive map of the area
Explanation:
A cognitive map is basically a mental map or representation of the physical surrounding area. If you have ever seen a lab rat trying to go through a maze, that is exactly what this is about. The ability to mentally represent of physical surroundings is very important, and not just to avoid traffic jams, but for our normal daily activities. We all know where the bathroom is, or the kitchen, and our rooms, etc., that is basically a cognitive map of our house.
Consider a town in which only two residents, Hubert and Kate, own wells that produce water safe for drinking. Hubert and Kate can pump and sell as much water as they want at no cost. For them, total revenue equals profit.
The following table shows the town's demand schedule for water,
Quantity Demanded Total Revenue (Dollars per gallon) (Gallons of water) (Dollars) $247.50 $450.00 $607.50 4.00 180 $720.00 $787.50 3.00 270 $810.00 $787.50 2.00 $720.00 $607.50 $450.00 $247.50 (Look at attached image for clearer image)
Answer:
$3, $810
Explanation:
By carefully examining the table above we can infer that Hubert and Kate's profit is maximised at $3 unit price.
The total output at this point is 270 with a total Revenue of $810, implying that they will share the amount equally 810/2= $405 for Kate and $405 for Hubert.
Answer:
Annual cashflow for the decision= $162 million
Explanation:
The proper cashflow would be determined as follows:
Contribution per unit = Sales price - variable cost
Contribution per unit of new chip = 25-8 = $17 per unit
Contribution per unit of old chip = 20 - 6 = 14 per unit.
<em>Contribution form the sale of the new chip = contribution per unit × annual sales in unit</em>
=17 × 12 million units = $204 million
<em>lost Contribution from the old chip = contribution per unit × lost annual sales in unit</em>
Lost contribution from old chip= $14 × 3 million unit = $42 million
Note that the lost contribution is an opportunity cost occasioned as a result of the introducing the new chip, hence the contribution should be deducted
Annual cashflow for the decision= $204 million -$42 million = $162 million
Annual cashflow for the decision= $162 million
Probability gives all people a chance of being selected and makes results more likely to accurately reflect the entire population. That is not the case for non-probability. Probability sampling versus non-probability sampling for hotels can be a confusing concept for anyone carrying out survey research projects. Knowing some basic information about survey sampling designs and how they differ can help you understand the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches.
Probability gives all people a chance of being selected and makes results more likely to accurately reflect the entire population. That is not the case for non-probability.
In a perfect world you could always use a probability-based sample, but in reality, you have to consider the other factors affecting your results (availability, cost, time, what you want to say about results). It is also possible to use both different types for the same project.
(Can I have brainliest I need 5 more to have a new rank)
Answer:
Al can't raise the statute o frauds as a defense against enforcement of the contract. Because he broke the 10 days period to do it.
Explanation:
The Statute of fraud as a defense against enforcement of the contract is only available if one of the parties showed discontent over the contract in formal written means to declare it is not going to pursue the operation. The only writing would be enough to do it. So, in this case, Al can't do it because he let 10 days pass.
