Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
Answer:
A) Prepare the revenues section of the income statement.
Lopez Company
Income Statement for the year ended MM DD, YY
Sales Revenue $852,850
-Sales Returns and Allowances $24,030
-Sales Discounts <u> $12,760 </u>
= Net Sales <u>$816,060</u>
B) Prepare separate closing entries for
(1) sales
Dr. Cr.
Sales $852,850
Income Summary $852,850
(2) the contra accounts to sales.
Dr. Cr.
Income Summary $36,736
Sales Returns and Allowances $24,030
Sales Discount $12,706
Answer:
$48
Explanation:
Calculation the minimum transfer price that the Heating Division should accept
Using this formula
Minimum transfer price=[New UVC + (Lost USP - Regular UVC)]
Let plug in the formula
Minimum transfer price=$28+ ($40- $20)
Minimum transfer price=$28+20
Minimum transfer price= $48
Therefore the minimum transfer price that the Heating Division should accept is $48
Answer: Statement A
Explanation: Convertible bonds is a type of bond security which gives its holder the right to convert each bond to a specified number of shares. These are hybrid securities having features of both equity and debt.
.
Warrants are securities that give their holder the right to purchase the common shares of the company at a specified price and before a certain time period.
.
Thus, from the above explanation we can conclude that statement A is correct.
