Answer:
Coupon (R) = 6.8% x 10,000 = $680
Face value (FV) = $10,000
Number of times coupon is paid in a year (m) = 2
No of years to maturity = 8 years
Yield to maturity (Kd) = 8% = 0.08
Po = R/2(1- (1 + r/m)-nm) + FV/ (1+r/m)n
m
r/m
Po = 680/2(1-(1+0.08/2)-8x2) + 10,000/(1 + 0.08/2
)8x2
0.08/2
Po = 340(1 - (1 + 0.04)-16) + 10,000/(1 + 0.04)16
0.04
Po = 340(1-0.5339) + 10,000/1.8730
0.04
Po = 3,961.85 + 5,339.03
Po = $9,300.88
Explanation:
The current market price of a bond is a function of the present value of semi-annual coupon and present value of the face value. The present value of semi-annual coupon is obtained by multiplying the coupon by the present value of annuity factor at 8% for 8 years. The present value of face value is obtained by discounting the face value at the discount factor for 8 years. The addition of the two gives the present value of the bond. All these explanations have been captured by the formula.
Answer:
annual income = $70,292.52
Explanation:
initial outlay $900,000
in order to determine the net cash flows per year we can use the present value of an ordinary annuity:
PV = annual cash flow x annuity factor
- PV = $900,000
- annuity factor, 15%, 12 years = 6.1944
annual cash flow = $900,000 / 6.1944 = $145,292.52
annual cash flow = [(revenue - operating costs - depreciation) x (1 - tax rate)] + depreciation
- revenue - operating costs - depreciation = annual income
- tax rate = 0?
- depreciation = $900,000 / 12 = $75,000
$145,292.52 = annual income + $75,000
annual income = $145,292.52 - $75,000 = $70,292.52
Answer: Option A
Explanation: In simple words, Ponzi scheme refers to a scheme in which a company deceit their earlier investor by paying them from the funds of recent investors in the form of profits.
In the given case, Levi deceited Charles by making him believe of a strategy that may or may not exist in his organisation. Thus, he will pay charles from the money that he will gain from the market after the announcement of the new processor.
Hence from the above we can conclude that the correct option is A.
<span>The workers had believed that they deserved shorter work days and better pay. The management had believed that the workers did not have a right to strike. Cheap labor was available.
Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
Answer: See explanation column for answer
Explanation:
Caroline
left Right
Anthonio left 6,6 6,3
Right 4,3 5,5
The first digits in both left and right is Anthonio's best response payoff given what Caroline chooses. Also, the second digit on both left and right is Caroline's best response payoff based on what Anthonio chooses.
When Antonio chooses left, Caroline should choose left so as to get a payoff of 6, also when Antonio chooses right, Caroline chooses right to get a payoff of 5. therefore, there is no dominant strategy for Caroline.
The dominant strategy for Antonio occurs
When Caroline chooses left, Antonio will have to choose left to get a payoff of 6, also when Caroline chooses right, Antonio should choose left to get a payoff of 6. So, the dominant strategy for Antonio is to choose left.
The only dominant strategy in this game is for Antonio, to choose left.
b). For Nash Equilibrum, Antonio will have to choose his dominant strategy, that is to choose left, which will make Caroline is to choose left so as to get a payoff of 6. So, the Nash equilibrium is for Antonio to choose <u>left </u>and caroline chooses<u> left</u> too
