1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nlexa [21]
3 years ago
12

In the United States, donations of tissue and organs are regulated by the federal government, and the National Organ Transplant

Act makes it illegal to buy or sell tissues or organs. In 2009, a group of cancer patients filed a lawsuit to allow the purchase of bone marrow to cure their diseases. The court legalized the purchase of bone marrow and set the price at three thousand dollars. Donors can now be compensated for bone marrow donations. Which of the following is a potential ethical concern that may result from this ruling?
a. fewer people will donate bone marrow and more patients will die while waiting for transplants.

b.this practice will increase the number of patients waiting for transplants

c. this will increase how often bone marrow is sold on the black market

d. patients who cannot afford to purchase bone marrow will have to wait for voluntary donors.
English
1 answer:
anygoal [31]3 years ago
6 0

A potential ethical concern that may result from the ruling stated above is:

<span>d. patients who cannot afford to purchase bone marrow will have to wait for voluntary donors.</span>

By the time supply is not enough to address the high demand; some donors will find all means to provide the best deal they think will benefit them the most. On the other hand, the patients will be forced to buy the needed bone marrow as emergency needs arise. Therefore, rich patients can secure a donor immediately while poor patients will still have to wait for a voluntary donor since priority is set to those to have the money not to those who are in need of it so badly.

You might be interested in
Are warmongers the greatest enemies for peace? What do you want to suggest to them? Please help me for this speech I'll make thi
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

A little more than two years have passed since the first Information Meeting of the representatives of a number of Communist Parties was held.

The Declaration issued by this Meeting gave a profound analysis of changes which had taken place in the international situation as a result of World War Two and during the first postwar years. It revealed the formation of two camps in the world arena and the contrast of their aims and tasks; it exposed the aggressive plans of the imperialist camp headed by the U.S.—plans aimed at establishing world domination of Anglo-American imperialism and destroying democracy; it laid bare the treacherous role of the chieftains of Right-Wing Social Democracy as accomplices of imperialism in all its anti-popular activities.

The entire course of events for the past two years has fully confirmed the correctness of the estimation of the international situation given by the first Meeting of the Information Bureau, and of the perspectives and tasks of the anti-imperialist camp as outlined by that Meeting.

Estimating the significance of the decisions passed by the first Meeting of the Information Bureau, and also of the Resolution concerning the “Situation in the Communist Party of Yugoslavia” passed by the second Meeting of the Information Bureau, it can be boldly said today that these decisions are really historical decisions; that they played an outstanding role in mobilizing, organizing and consolidating the ranks of the international working-class movement; in mobilizing the masses to rebuff world reaction and the instigators of a new war; in further increasing and strengthening the forces of democracy and Socialism throughout the world.

During the period that has elapsed since the first Meeting of the Information Bureau, considerable changes have taken place in the international situation.

I.  CONSPIRACY OF THE AGGRESSORS AGAINST THE PEACE AND SECURITY OF THE PEOPLES

For the past two years, two lines in world policy have become even more clear and sharp—the line of the democratic, anti-imperialist camp headed by the U.S.S.R.—the camp waging a persistent and consistent struggle against imperialist reaction, for peace between peoples and for democracy, and the line of the imperialist, anti-democratic camp headed by the U.S.—the camp which has as its main object the enslavement of other countries and peoples, the forcible establishment of Anglo-American world domination, destruction of the forces of democracy and the unleashing of a new war. The struggle between these opposite camps has sharpened. The aggressive nature of the imperialist camp has further increased.

Whereas the first Meeting of the Information Bureau stated that the U.S. and Britain were going over to the policy of preparing new military adventures, at present the ruling circles of the United States and Britain heading the imperialist camp openly pursue the policy of aggression—the policy of preparing and unleashing a new world war.

Having taken the path of military-political conspiracy against peace and the security of the peoples, the ruling circles of the U.S. and Britain drive at full speed preparing a new war and are declaring with increasingly cynical shamelessness and insolence, their claims for world domination, the “American leadership of the world,” reviving the insane plans of German fascism and forgetting the historical lessons given to crazy pretenders for “world domination.”

The entire policy of the Anglo-American imperialist bloc serves the aim of preparing a new world war. It finds expression in the unrestrained economic, political and military expansion carried out by the U.S. on all continents in an attempt to seize military-strategic raw materials and other resources essential for war preparations. The U.S. imperialists are netting the entire globe with military, naval and air bases, and are preparing springboards for a new war. The support rendered by the Anglo-American imperialists to all outmoded reactionary regimes (the Franco Government in Spain, the monarcho-fascist Government in Greece, Chiang Kai-shek in China, and so on), to the remnants of the destroyed exploiting classes, spies, saboteurs and murderers in the People’s Democracies, to reactionary forces all over the world-all this serves the aim of preparing a new war. U.S. imperialism has become the center and mainstay of world reaction.

Imperialist circles of the U.S. and of Britain have openly trampled under foot the decisions of the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences, aimed at a just solution of the German problem and to transform Germany into a democratic peace-loving State. After pledging themselves to regard Germany as a single unit, they pursue a policy of splitting Germany, crowning this policy with the establishment of the puppet Bonn “Government.”

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Question 5 of 20
Shalnov [3]
Bandwagon, because he's hopping on board with reviewers and bloggers.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Read the sentence and determine the meaning of the prefix in the underlined word.
Nana76 [90]
D is the answer because nothing else makes sense
3 0
2 years ago
What did hiding in the annex mean to Anne? (anne frank)
timurjin [86]

Answer:

it meant the she was safe from nazi  and she didn't understand how bad it was really was for people who couldn't hide.

Explanation: although she was safe she didn't understand the actual struggles of jew

8 0
3 years ago
HEYOO PEEPS PUT THIS INTO UR OWN WORDS "States that an object’s acceleration"
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object.

Explanation: THERE GO PEEP

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the opposite of unfairness
    10·1 answer
  • An object pronoun takes the place of a/an _______ in the object part of a sentence.
    11·2 answers
  • What is gained by making the film a flashback as opposed to the way it is presented in the book?
    10·1 answer
  • The Stanford University Graduate School of Education study found that fact checkers where the most likely to believe fake news.
    14·1 answer
  • 16, 19, 24, 31. ...<br>What is the seventh term in the sequence?​
    6·2 answers
  • ? Question
    12·1 answer
  • How many letters is in the alphabet
    14·2 answers
  • “To dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another.”
    14·2 answers
  • In a sunrise on the veld how does he feel about himself and about his surrondings as he goes out into the veld?
    11·1 answer
  • Why do we need to identify the issue that arise in the team
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!