The correct options are the options B. To address economic difficulties, such as the standardization of currency, and option D. To provide for means of resolving conflicts between states.
There were 13 Articles of Confederation and 13 states, the Articles were modified because it was a growing country, specially after the war, and the Articles had their limitations, they were focus on the central government, but on the other hand it gaves sovereign to each state. With the modification it was neither one not the other but a mixture of both of them, that made a more complete Constitution of the United States.
Hello,
The question is asking <span>Which is NOT a reason for relaxing immigration policy?
Remember we have NOT So its the opposite.
Are answer choices are </span><span>
A) The U.S. does not have a national language.
B) Immigrants require social services
C) Immigrants fill necessary low-level jobs
D) Cultural variety is integral to American ideology
And to answer this I must give you the answer is B) Immigrants require social services.
Hello, If you loved this answer why not mark brainiest!
Thx Young lad! ~ Young Sinatra
</span><span>
</span>
Reason for Radical republicans to punish the south
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The civil war was started because of the uncompromising variations between the slave and free states. over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery on the territories that were not even formed as states.
- The south state wished to assert their authority over the federal government to abolish federal laws that were opposed by them especially the law interfering south's right to keep slaves and take them wherever they wished. This right was opposed ad=nd the south decided to war.
Mr. Justice Jackson, dissenting. . . .
Much is said of the danger to liberty from the Army program for deporting and detaining these citizens of Japanese extraction. But a judicial construction of the due process clause that will sustain this order is a far more subtle blow to liberty than the promulgation of the order itself. A military order, however unconstitutional, is not apt to last longer than the military emergency. Even during that period a succeeding commander may revoke it all. But once a judicial opinion rationalizes such an order to show that it conforms to the Constitution, or rather rationalizes the Constitution to show that the Constitution sanctions such an order, the Court for all time has validated the principle of racial discrimination in criminal procedure and of transplanting American citizens. . . . A military commander may overstep the bounds of constitutionality, and it is an incident. But if we review and approve, that passing incident becomes the doctrine of the Constitution. There it has a generative power of its own, and all that it creates will be in its own image. Nothing better illustrates this danger than does the Court’s opinion in this case. . . .
yes i copy and pasted but this is your answer
(b) Americanize them, and yes that is a real term.
