<span>performing multiple functions in the vehicle at the same time</span>
In the people's republic of china "a new set of social classes is gradually emerging".
Social stratification is a sort of social separation whereby a society gatherings individual into financial strata, in light of their occupation and pay, riches and economic wellbeing, or inferred influence. A few social orders are more open in such manner, while some are more shut. The significant frameworks of stratification are slavery, estate systems, caste systems, and class systems.
<span>Native Americans and Africans. I don't quite remember but it's in my guts</span>
Answer: Yes, Confucius was a good leader. Confucius urged ethical and upright behavior, framing responsible government as a moral duty similar to parenthood. He believed providing a good example of moral conduct to the people would spur them to act within the confines of the law. Many Chinese rulers drew upon Confucian principles. For example, Emperor Wu of Han promoted hierarchical social structures based on Confucian principles, which he believed would bring about greater social harmony throughout Chinese society. Confucius wanted things to be done with morals, respect and dignity.
Explanation:
Well, if we're talking about the revolutionary war, then yes! Definitely! The colonies were trying to their hardest to break away from Great Britain, but Great Britain just refused to let go. It was unnecessary to keep holding on, especially with how unpractical it was with England all the way overseas. A happy ruling was not possible, as the kind refused to listen to the colonists demands and was not particularly concerned with their well-being. Ultimately, the colonists wanted freedom - that is why their ancestors came to the land in the first place, anyways. And so the war began.