Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the graph we can notice something
let's take the abscissa -2 and -4
- the ordinate that goes with -2 using g is 0
- the ordinate that goes with -4 using f is 0
so we can say that :
f(-4)=g(-2)
wait we khow that g(x)=f(k*x)
so x= -2 then let's replace it in the expression : f(k*x)
we get f(-4)=g(-2)=f[k*(-2)]
let's solve the equation: -2k = -4
k = -4/-2
k=2
so finally we get k=2
let's check :
from the graph we get :
we have (-1)*2 = -2
so it is true
I really, really don't like this question. People have preferences in solving quadratics. I would personally use, and would encourage anyone to use the quadratic equation. That's because completing the square would get excessively fractional, graphically doesn't even work because the solutions are imaginary, and differentiating it wouldn't be necessary, as there are no irrational numbers (except i, which is just imaginary). So, in short, quadratic equation because you can't get anything graphically, the answers are ugly fractions, and you can actually use that method.
Answer:
-31/26
Step-by-step explanation:
To find the slope
m= ( y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
= ( 15 - -16)/(-7 - 19)
= ( 15+16)/(-7-19)
= 31/ -26
-31/26
It's the bottom one. Miko found the incorrect and checked her work using multipication incorrectly.
This is because the correct way to solve this would to use (5/1) * (3/5) = (15/5) then simplify it to 3/1 or simply 3.
Dividing fractions is simply flipping the second fraction and then multiplying across
10/16=x/124
X=(124)(10)/(16)=1240/16=80
