1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
krok68 [10]
4 years ago
11

Why did European powers compete for control of Muslim states? Check all that apply. to win trade rights in Russia to control nat

ural resources in Persia to claim territory in the Persian Gulf to gain access to the Middle East to control trade routes to India
History
2 answers:
Monica [59]4 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Among the options given on the question the correct answers are given below.

*to gain access to the middle East

*to control trade routes to India

*to control natural natural resources in Persia.

Explanation: There was a competition between the European powers such as Britain,France to control Muslim States. There are many reasons to gain control in Muslim countries. Because the Muslim countries were situated in the Middle East. The Muslim countries situated in the middle east were full of natural resources which is mainly petroleum. There was great demand for petroleum during that time for oil.So, the control over the Muslim countries would make the European powers to control these natural resources.

Moreover, the control of Muslim states would give the European powers to control trade routes to India. The trade road to India was important that time for controlling the business.

d1i1m1o1n [39]4 years ago
7 0

The Answer is B D E

(B) to gain access to the middle East

(C) to control trade routes to India

(E)to control natural natural resources in Persia.

You might be interested in
How did the discovery of the Americas affect the people of Africa
insens350 [35]
Well, once the Americas were discovered and the colonist found that the soil was agreeable to grow different crops such as tobacco and cotton the colonists realized that they needed people to pick the crops. Originally indentured servants did the hard labor but then when they found that they could get labor by trading goods with African tribal leaders they resorted to importing Africans to the Americas as labor. The tribes in Africa were constantly fighting and whichever side won the losers became the slaves of the winning tribe. However, as Europeans brought valuable things to the continent of Africa such as weapons, salt, gold, and other things the leaders of the winning tribe would give their slaves to the Europeans. There were cases when Blacks captured other Blacks in Africa for the sole purpose of giving them to the European traders. Hopefully this helps. If you haven't see the movie La Amistad, it will explain in more detail what I have written. I learned a lot from that movie. I must warn you the first 5 to 10 minutes are a bit gory. I had a hard time watching that part. 
8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is Governor Faubus’s explanation for his opposition to the admission of African Americans to Central High School?
Margaret [11]

Answer:

Governor's Faubus' explanation for his opposition to the admission of African Americans to Central High School was that he feared there would be violence and disorder if desegregation went forward. We are referring to the situation called "the Little Rock Crisis."

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
A country does not need clearly defined
Solnce55 [7]
A country does not need a clearly defined language
7 0
3 years ago
imagine you to convince the local school board that eliminating elective courses for struggling students is bad idea which appea
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer: it would be a bad idea

Explanation:

because electives can be super easy and they also can bring your gpa up so maybe you’ll have bad grades in your other classes but atleast you’re gpa will be higher then it would

8 0
3 years ago
How did the economic and social divide between the north and south need to increase sectionalism and eventually the Civil War
trapecia [35]

Answer:

The North was an industrial economy by 1860 and the South continued to be an agricultural economy producing cotton, tobacco, sugar and other things. The southern economy relied heavily on slave labor, which was not the case of the North.

In the decades previous to the Civil War (1861-1865), the different administrations imposed high tariffs to foreign products to protect the American- made northern products. This meant that northern products had usually a high price southerners had to pay for; this originated many claims of a preferential treatment which was damaging for the South and disatisfaction.

And of course, there were the rising tensions over the issue of slavery and whether new states should join the Union as free or slavery states.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When was the worst period of the black death?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the lowest point in Asia?
    10·1 answer
  • About how many acres did the Adams property cover during its most prosperous years?
    12·1 answer
  • What did the north do economically during the civil war opposed to the south?
    12·1 answer
  • According to "3 Reasons Brits Voted for Brexit" by George Freidman, the three main causes which led up to the UK's decision to l
    7·1 answer
  • What possible danger did the gusher present
    6·1 answer
  • The Presidential election of 1972 resulted in a landslide victory for
    12·2 answers
  • Which Famous battle was fought in 1066 lol
    5·1 answer
  • 4. In Hinduism, the belief that society is closed and there are different
    15·1 answer
  • Giving brainliest only if it’s correct
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!