<h2> Children & Voting</h2>
Consequences and both negative and positive sides
I think children should not be allowed to vote for things such as presidents, since it's a big responsibility. But I do think, early teens and teenagers (12+) should be smart enough to elect a candidate, and predict the consequences of their election.
If I vote for a person with a dirty history, I should predict there is no reason why he/she should suddenly be a clean person.
If I vote for a person with a clean history, but that doesn't seem to be willing to do or change anything, I should be able to predict that things will remain the same, if not worse.
Even if most children that age, are responsible enough to vote, it's a huge responsibility, and the truth is, newer generations are gradually loosing interest in politics, which means they will relatively become more politically naive, affecting their decisions.
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
Answer:
thire is no grup 13 in modern periodic table
ANSWER:
75 emails.
Trey has to answer a total of 75 emails.
STEP-BY-STEP EXPLANATION:
If:
20% of emails = 15
Then:
20% × 5 = 15 × 5
100% of emails = 75
All of the aforementioned are implied by Viagra advertisements except that: women should be more se-xually assertive.
<h3>What is an advertisement?</h3>
An advertisement can be defined as consumer promotions programs that are designed and developed with the sole intention of making the various goods (products) or services which are being offered by a business firm to become known, popular and familiar to all of its customers and potential customers.
In this scenario, we can infer and logically that Viagra advertisements which depicts it as being an aphrodisiac and se-xual enhancer doesn't imply that women should be more se-xually assertive over their male counterparts (partners).
Read more on advertisements here: brainly.com/question/10196860
#SPJ1
