Neither, in all honesty the amount of nuclear explosives both countries have they would completely destroy each other. There would be no winner
The ruler who promoted religious diversity in the Ottoman Empire was
Akbar. Akbar encouraged people from all backgrounds and faiths to be
part of his rule, encouraging everyone to join his army and therefore
built a strong force in the process. Although he himself was Muslim, he
married a Hindu princess.
<span>Sharecropping is a risky venture for both the sharecropper and the farmer. Just to be clear, the large farmer leases some of his land on speculation to a smaller farmer in return for part of the potential profits after harvest. If it's a good crop, both do OK. If there's a crop failure, or the market is down come autumn, both are SOL. The sharecropper's farm was small enough that he couldn't possibly get rich, unless some miracle happened in the market, but he had all to lose. And farming has never been easy work.</span>
The correct answer is C.
A is incorrect because the battles were not at sea and had nothing to do with ships.
C is incorrect because the Crusades had nothing to do with contributing money to the Church (but rather defending it against Muslims).
D is incorrect because, although knights did wear these crosses, they, alone, were not the Crusades.
President Roosevelt wanted to build a canal in panama so he could ship goods quickly and cheaply between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.
