9 Letter C 8 c 7 d 6 a 8 b
Crossrail 1 project is about to start in London.
This project will require an initial investment of 9.4 billion. The project will start earning cash flows from year and it will continue to year 60 which is useful life of the project.
The NPV for the project will be 7.36 which is positive. The correct answer is c.
The payback period for project is 13.04 years which is given in the option a so correct answer is a.
The internal rate of return for the project is b. 7.35 .
Based on our analytics and calculation since NPV is positive so cross rail project is beneficial. The board should consider launching this project.
Learn more at brainly.com/question/24353321
Answers:
1.
Financing Activity
2.
Operating Activity
3.
Operating Activity
4.
Non Cash Activity
5.
Financing Activity
6.
Non Cash Activity
7.
Operating Activity
8.
Investing Activity
9.
Non Cash Activity
What to remember:
Operating activities are the kinds of activities the company
accomplishes to generate profits. This includes cash out flows and inflows.
Investing activities contain the purchase or sale of
long-lived assets used in operating the business, or the purchase or sale of
investment securities (stocks and bonds of companies other than Thyme).
Financing activities are borrowing money, issuing shares of
stock, and paying dividends.
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
