Solution :
In the context, it is given Alex and J.J. both are applying for a job openings in a law firm at Chicago. Both of them got the job offer but J.J. got lower salary than Alex. The salaries are different for both J.J and Alex. Some of the possible explanations for the difference in salaries that may be related to some scenarios are :
- Alex went to higher tier law school ---- difference in education
- J.J. is reentering the workforce after two years away --- difference in experiences.
- Alex will be working with a notoriously difficult boss --- compensating differentials.
- Alex is a man and J.J. Is a woman --- economic discrimination.
The home depot's return on assets is 19.05%
The home depot's return on assets is 8.05% better than the 11% return of lowe's
What is return on assets?
The return on on assets means the net income of Home Depot as percentage of the average total assets, in other words, the return on assets is the net income divided average total assets , not sales revenue, which is applicable to profit margin
return on assets=net income/average total assets
net income=8 billion
average total assets=42 billion
return on assets=8 billion/42 billion
return on assets=19.05%
difference in return on assets=19.05%-11
difference in return on assets=8.05%
The home depot's return on assets is 8.05% better than the 11% return of lowe's
Find out more about return on assets on:brainly.com/question/23554298
#SPJ1
Answer:
B. is able to accumulate tax-free interest earnings on cash values.
Explanation: whole life insurance policy also known as permanent life insurance,is an insurance policy where people who buy the policy are deferred from paying tax,this policy ensure that you pay the same amount of premium throughout the policy,it is a policy that is not termed and it doesn't expire it can last up to 120years.
How much something cost is it's monetary value.
Leadership is not needed when:
- It will make processes inefficient due to time wasting
- It is being used to oppress people
- Subordinates don't need leadership
Leadership is usually quite good as it can galvanize subordinates to be better workers due to better organization as well as inspiration.
There are instances where it is not needed however such as when:
- It slows down processes - sometimes leaders will need to give permission for a subordinate to do something. If this thing is time conscious and the leader is not available to give their ascent, the whole process could suffer.
- It oppresses people - when a leader is an oppressive one and acts in such a way that their subordinates suffer, that leadership is not needed.
- Subordinates are fine without it - sometimes workers have the necessary skills and experience to operate independently without a leader. In such a case, a leader is not needed.
In conclusion, while a leader is quite important in many ways, there can be situations where it is best that they are not used.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/24150490.</em>
