A historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
<h3>What is bias?</h3>
Bias refers to a historian's perspective being strongly for or against an issue.
Historical bias refers to when the information in the source can be clearly described as <u>unfair, unbalanced, or prejudiced</u>.
Thus, a historical source is <u>biased</u> when it can be deemed unreliable because the author appears to unfairly favor a particular side or viewpoint.
Learn more about a biased historical source at brainly.com/question/1614300
#SPJ1
The best answer to the problem is the bottom answer
"<span>C.) Japan and China colonized other parts of Asia in order to spread the influence of their customs and beliefs" would be the best option from the list, but it should be noted that Japan was far more imperial than China in this regard.</span>
D Rosetta Stone
:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
<span>North Korea had a large number of troops contrary to the south that was a major advantage did North Korea Possess. This would be the correct answer.</span>