Answer:
Question 1: Answer is Option A: The British finally gave India a much greater level of independence.
Question 2: Answer is Option B: British companies ignored the limits imposed by the caste system and hired laborers on the basis of merit instead
Explanation:
<u>Question 1:</u>
Indian Army played a major role in world war 1. There were around 13 lakh Indian soldiers who served during World War I and fought for the Britishers. When the World War I ended in 1919, Indians were promoted to higher officer ranks. Many cadets were also sent to study in "Great Britain" at the "Royal Military College".
<u>Question 2:</u>
As far as caste system was concerned, British served their own interests as it was very difficult for them to manage large Indian population and that to with wide variety of castes. So, they created single society with common laws so that they can easily govern them. So, they use to hire labors on the basis of merit and industrialization occurred in India.
Since you provide no picture , In the past, mongols was able to conquer almost all part of Asia and some part of eastern Europe.
So here are some territories that mongols did not conquer :
- Western Europe, such as France and England
- South East Asia , such as malaysia , Indonesia, Thailand
- Africa , such as Egypt
<span>Separation of Church and State is and Enlightenment era idea, much later than the Byzantines. Polemon could be a Japanese game but its not. Its the name of several Greek guys, a philosopher, a king and that sort of guy. But they all lived in the 4th century BC or earlier. Hagia Sophia is a great building built by the Byzantines, used as a stable by the Janissary when the finally took Constantinople and is now a mosque in Istanbul. Its Byzantine, but doesnt have much to do with law. So that leaves.... Code, in law, means an organized list of laws. So that could be it. Justinian was a great Byzantine leader. So Im thinkin weve got your answer. </span>
I believe the answer is “c” or “yet have had no opportunity to find out what the world is like”.
i think this is the answer because it shows quite a bit of sympathy or remorse for the women living at home by pointing out how after they are married, they have no freedom. hope that helped!
a) one argument that barton makes in the passage is that historians cannot recreate a new history just because they don't want britain or europe being in the center of world history, and such acts will only vandalize history. The passage talked about 'de-center' Europe from the world history will present many problems, and this meant that we should learn the right history and we shouldn't focusing on making history what we like.
b) one cultural or economic development in the late 20th century that explain the "impending decline of the west" was the decolonization events, which led to many European countries to become less powerful since they cannot get as much money from their colonies anymore like they used to. which led to many new nations with new cultures forming, not the blind triumphalism of the old modernization theory of inevitable progress towards westernization.
c) one cultural or economic change in the late 20th century that historians who supported the process of de-centering world history would cite as a limitation was the soviet union's success in the middle east, which supported barton's argument in the 2nd paragraph where "westernization is inevitable".
