In the logistic population growth model, the per capita rate of increases approaches zero as the carrying capacity is reached.
Carrying capacity will be defined as a species' average population size during a particular habitat. The species population size is proscribed by environmental factors like adequate food, shelter, water, and mates. If these needs don't seem to be met, the population will decrease until the resource rebounds.
Carrying capacity, or the most number of people that an environment can sustain over time without destroying or degrading the environment, is set by some key factors: food availability, water, and space.
For example; Many scientists think Earth includes a maximum carrying capacity of 9 billion to 10 billion people.
To know more about carrying capacity here
brainly.com/question/1616314
#SPJ4
not sure if this helps but I hope it does
sorry its so long
To date erosion scientists have failed to address — or have addressed inadequately — some of the ‘big questions’ of our discipline. For example, where is erosion occurring? Why is it happening, and who is to blame? How serious is it? Who does it affect? What should be the response? Can we prevent it? What are the costs of erosion? Our inability or reluctance to answer such questions damages our credibility and is based on weaknesses in commonly-used approaches and the spatial and temporal scales at which much research is carried out. We have difficulty in the recognition, description and quantification of erosion, and limited information on the magnitude and frequency of events that cause erosion. In particular there has been a neglect of extreme events which are known to contribute substantially to total erosion. The inadequacy and frequent misuse of existing data leaves us open to the charge of exaggeration of the erosion problem (a la Lomborg).
Models need to be developed for many purposes and at many scales. Existing models have proved to be of limited value, in the real as opposed to the academic world, both because of problems with the reliability of their results, and difficulties (with associated costs) of acquiring suitable data. However, there are some positive signs: models are now being developed for purposes including addressing questions of off-site impacts and land-use policy. Cheap, reliable and technically simple methods of erosion assessment at the field scale are needed. At the global scale, an up-date of GLASOD based on a scientific approach is urgent so that we are at least able to identify erosion ‘hotspots’.
In terms of explanation of erosion, the greatest need is for a full recognition of the importance of socio-economic drivers. The accession of new countries to the EU with different economic and land-use histories emphasises this need. Too often we have left people, especially the farmers, out of the picture. Our approach could be characterised as ‘data-rich and people-poor’.
<span>Dorothy is 86 years of age. Her "arthritis" is likely to have a negative influence her nutritional status.
Arthritis refers to very painful for patients and baffling for specialists. Nutrition can help, either with drugs or, at times, rather than them. It influence the joints in two noteworthy ways. The part of nourishment in joint pain was questionable until the point that the mid 1990s when explore ponders set up its part past any sensible uncertainty. Hope this helps!
</span>
Answer: Simeon or Symeon
Explanation: Simon is one Latinised version of the name, the others being Simeon or Symeon. This practice carried over into English: in the king James version, the name Simeon Niger Is spelt Simeon (Acts 13:1) as is Simeon (Gospel of Luke) (Luke to 2:25) while Peter is called Simon (John 14:4)
Answer:
Guide question:
1.healty lifestyle
2.that can cause bad effects in our body
3.eating healthy foods.
sorry kung may wrong grammar.
