Explanation:
Fola Coal company is an US based company dealing with coal mining.
Its parent company is Consol Energy. Fola Coal company has permits for discharging the water into the stream and it discharges water to the stream after treating it and making them pollutant free so that it does not pollute the nearby streams and water bodies.
But Fola started violating the pollution laws and started discharging polluted water to the water bodies.
The United States Envirronmental Protection Agengy, shortly known as EPA and the private citizens of the nearby place where the coal mining is located can file a case of violation in the Federal Court against Fola Coal Company for violating the environmental laws and discharging contaminated water which contains ions and sulphates into the streams
The properties of matter which would help her to determine if the two substances are the same is:
<h3>Solubility</h3>
This refers to the ability of a liquid to dissolve into a given solvent at a particular temperature.
With this in mind, we can see that this would help the student to find out if the two liquids are the same.
Therefore,, the correct answer is option B
Read more about solubility here;
brainly.com/question/23946616
Answer:
This is an example of marginal analysis, as the decisions made by Raphael are on margin.
Explanation:
The decision of Raphael about pool versus bike time is totally a "how-much decision". It is clear that pool time and bike time can both reduce the time for race. However, the efficiency of pool time is high currently, and hence there is much sense in trying to spend more time in the pool and less on bike. This however makes no sense that all the time is spent in the pool and no time biking. Raphael only intends to alter the number of hours spend on each activity at the margin.
Answer:
The 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause
Explanation: This clause requires that all people residing in the US should be treated the same. The 14th's Equal Protection Clause forces states to govern impartially and not draw distinctions between individuals solely on differences that are irrelevant to a legitimate governmental objectives. Equal Protection Clause makes no distinction between citizens and non-citizens.
