The question has the following answers attached
SSID
WEP
WPA
WPA2
Answer is WPA2
WEP is weak and remains highly vulnerable and is hardly used. There are simple and readily available tools that can be used to hack WEP encryption. If you have a choice to make between WPA and WPA2, I would suggest you choose WPA2 over its predecessor WPA. Both encryption methods support secure wireless internet networks from unauthorized access but WPA2 offers more protection. WPA2 uses more advanced and stronger encryption keys and support maximum protection for your connection.
Answer:
Option B (Deployment of write once read many (WORM) drives) is the appropriate one.
Explanation:
- SIEM application goods/services consolidate safety information management (SIM) with security event management (SEM) throughout the area of device protection. We include an overview including its known vulnerabilities created by users and network equipment in actual environments.
- No quantity of administrative intervention will alter the substance on something like a WORM disc, even by physical disc disruption or failure. That would be the better-suggested choice.
Could you be more specific? So I can help you in the best way I can.
Answer:
c. RETURN (count)
Explanation:
A typical return statement performs the function of terminating the execution of a function and returns control to the calling function.
Hence, there will execution resumed in the calling function at the point immediately following the call.
Another thing a return statement can do is to also return a value to the calling function.
The code RETURN (count) will
terminating the execution of a function and returns control to the calling function.
The device which provides any piece of information from a computer into human-readable form is known as the Output device.
Explanation:
