I am pretty sure it is B) Isaac Newton.
hope i helped ^.^
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Oral historians, because many of the ancient civilizations got passed down beliefs which led them to be able to get their customs and beliefs through oral historians
Feudalism formed with the gaining strength of the Shogunate. Samurai became a vital part of Japan, and people pledged their life to farms in exchange for protection.
Answer:(1) Hinduism believes in re-incarnation; Buddhism believes in re-birth. (2) Re-incarnation is akin to transmigration of souls; Rebirth is not akin to transmigration of soul. (3) Re-incarnation is based on permanence, eternality, and in-destructiveness of soul; Buddhism does not believe in any such property of soul.
Explanation: